A 50% Increase in Tether Supply Points to Another Bitcoin ...

Eth 2.0 vs Polkadot and other musings by a fundamental investor

Spent about two hours on this post and I decided it would help the community if I made it more visible. Comment was made as a response to this
I’m trying to avoid falling into a maximalist mindset over time. This isn’t a 100% ETH question, but I’m trying to stay educated about emerging tech.
Can someone help me see the downsides of diversifying into DOTs?
I know Polkadot is more centralized, VC backed, and generally against our ethos here. On chain governance might introduce some unknown risks. What else am I missing?
I see a bunch of posts about how Ethereum and Polkadot can thrive together, but are they not both L1 competitors?
Response:
What else am I missing?
The upsides.
Most of the guys responding to you here are full Eth maxis who drank the Parity is bad koolaid. They are married to their investment and basically emotional / tribal in an area where you should have a cool head. Sure, you might get more upvotes on Reddit if you do and say what the crowd wants, but do you want upvotes and fleeting validation or do you want returns on your investment? Do you want to be these guys or do you want to be the shareholder making bank off of those guys?
Disclaimer: I'm both an Eth whale and a Dot whale, and have been in crypto for close to a decade now. I originally bought ether sub $10 after researching it for at least a thousand hours. Rode to $1500 and down to $60. Iron hands - my intent has always been to reconsider my Eth position after proof of stake is out. I invested in the 2017 Dot public sale with the plan of flipping profits back to Eth but keeping Dots looks like the right short and long term play now. I am not a trader, I just take a deep tech dive every couple of years and invest in fundamentals.
Now as for your concerns:
I know Polkadot is more centralized
The sad truth is that the market doesn't really care about this. At all. There is no real statistic to show at what point a coin is "decentralized" or "too centralized". For example, bitcoin has been completely taken over by Chinese mining farms for about five years now. Last I checked, they control above 85% of the hashing power, they just spread it among different mining pools to make it look decentralized. They have had the ability to fake or block transactions for all this time but it has never been in their best interest to do so: messing with bitcoin in that way would crash its price, therefore their bitcoin holdings, their mining equipment, and their company stock (some of them worth billions) would evaporate. So they won't do it due to economics, but not because they can't.
That is the major point I want to get across; originally Bitcoin couldn't be messed with because it was decentralized, but now Bitcoin is centralized but it's still not messed with due to economics. It is basically ChinaCoin at this point, but the market doesn't care, and it still enjoys over 50% of the total crypto market cap.
So how does this relate to Polkadot? Well fortunately most chains - Ethereum included - are working towards proof of stake. This is obviously better for the environment, but it also has a massive benefit for token holders. If a hostile party wanted to take over a proof of stake chain they'd have to buy up a massive share of the network. The moment they force through a malicious transaction a proof of stake blockchain has the option to fork them off. It would be messy for a few days, but by the end of the week the hostile party would have a large amount of now worthless tokens, and the proof of stake community would have moved on to a version of the blockchain where the hostile party's tokens have been slashed to zero. So not only does the market not care about centralization (Bitcoin example), but proof of stake makes token holders even safer.
That being said, Polkadot's "centralization" is not that far off to Ethereum. The Web3 foundation kept 30% of the Dots while the Ethereum Foundation kept 17%. There are whales in Polkadot but Ethereum has them too - 40% of all genesis Ether went to 100 wallets, and many suspect that the original Ethereum ICO was sybiled to make it look more popular and decentralized than it really was. But you don't really care about that do you? Neither do I. Whales are a fact of life.
VC backed
VCs are part of the crypto game now. There is no way to get rid of them, and there is no real reason why you should want to get rid of them. They put their capital at risk (same as you and me) and seek returns on their investment (same as you and me). They are both in Polkadot and Ethereum, and have been for years now. I have no issue with them as long as they don't play around with insider information, but that is another topic. To be honest, I would be worried if VCs did not endorse chains I'm researching, but maybe that's because my investing style isn't chasing hype and buying SUSHI style tokens from anonymous (at the time) developers. That's just playing hot potato. But hey, some people are good at that.
As to the amount of wallets that participated in the Polkadot ICO: a little known fact is that more individual wallets participated in Polkadot's ICO than Ethereum's, even though Polkadot never marketed their ICO rounds due to regulatory reasons.
generally against our ethos here
Kool aid.
Some guy that works(ed?) at Parity (who employs what, 200+ people?) correctly said that Ethereum is losing its tech lead and that offended the Ethereum hivemind. Oh no. So controversial. I'm so personally hurt by that.
Some guy that has been working for free on Ethereum basically forever correctly said that Polkadot is taking the blockchain tech crown. Do we A) Reflect on why he said that? or B) Rally the mob to chase him off?
"I did not quit social media, I quit Ethereum. I did not go dark, I just left the community. I am no longer coordinating hard forks, building testnets, or contributing otherwise. I did not work on Polkadot, I never did, I worked on Ethereum. I did not hate Ethereum, I loved it."
Also Parity locked their funds (and about 500+ other wallets not owned by them) and proposed a solution to recover them. When the community voted no they backed off and did not fork the chain, even if they had the influence to do so. For some reason this subreddit hates them for that, even if Parity did the 100% moral thing to do. Remember, 500+ other teams or people had their funds locked, so Parity was morally bound to try its best to recover them.
Its just lame drama to be honest. Nothing to do with ethos, everything to do with emotional tribalism.
Now for the missing upsides (I'll also respond to random fragments scattered in the thread):
This isn’t a 100% ETH question, but I’m trying to stay educated about emerging tech.
A good quick intro to Eth's tech vs Polkadot's tech can be found on this thread, especially this reply. That thread is basically mandatory reading if you care about your investment.
Eth 2.0's features will not really kick in for end users until about 2023. That means every dapp (except DeFI, where the fees make sense due to returns and is leading the fee market) who built on Eth's layer 1 are dead for three years. Remember the trading card games... Gods Unchained? How many players do you think are going to buy and sell cards when the transaction fee is worth more than the cards? All that development is now practically worthless until it can migrate to its own shard. This story repeats for hundreds of other dapp teams who's projects are now priced out for three years. So now they either have to migrate to a one of the many unpopulated L2 options (which have their own list of problems and risks, but that's another topic) or they look for another platform, preferably one interoperable with Ethereum. Hence Polkadot's massive growth in developer activity. If you check out https://polkaproject.com/ you'll see 205 projects listed at the time of this post. About a week ago they had 202 listed. That means about one team migrated from another tech stack to build on Polkadot every two days, and trust me, many more will come in when parachains are finally activated, and it will be a complete no brainer when Polkadot 2.0 is released.
Another huge upside for Polkadot is the Initial Parachain Offerings. Polkadot's version of ICOs. The biggest difference is that you can vote for parachains using your Dots to bind them to the relay chain, and you get some of the parachain's tokens in exchange. After a certain amount of time you get your Dots back. The tokenomics here are impressive: Dots are locked (reduced supply) instead of sold (sell pressure) and you still earn your staking rewards. There's no risk of scammers running away with your Ether and the governance mechanism allows for the community to defund incompetent devs who did not deliver what was promised.
Wouldn’t an ETH shard on Polkadot gain a bunch of scaling benefits that we won’t see natively for a couple years?
Yes. That is correct. Both Edgeware and Moonbeam are EVM compatible. And if the original dapp teams don't migrate their projects someone else will fork them, exactly like SUSHI did to Uniswap, and how Acala is doing to MakerDao.
Although realistically Ethereum has a 5 yr headstart and devs haven't slowed down at all
Ethereum had a five year head start but it turns out that Polkadot has a three year tech lead.
Just because it's "EVM Compatible" doesn't mean you can just plug Ethereum into Polkadot or vica versa, it just means they both understand Ethereum bytecode and you can potentially copy/paste contracts from Ethereum to Polkadot, but you'd still need to add a "bridge" between the 2 chains, so it adds additional complexity and extra steps compared to using any of the existing L2 scaling solutions
That only applies of you are thinking from an Eth maximalist perspective. But if you think from Polkadot's side, why would you need to use the bridge back to Ethereum at all? Everything will be seamless, cheaper, and quicker once the ecosystem starts to flourish.
I see a bunch of posts about how Ethereum and Polkadot can thrive together, but are they not both L1 competitors?
They are competitors. Both have their strategies, and both have their strengths (tech vs time on the market) but they are clearly competing in my eyes. Which is a good thing, Apple and Samsung competing in the cell phone market just leads to more innovation for consumers. You can still invest in both if you like.
Edit - link to post and the rest of the conversation: https://www.reddit.com/ethfinance/comments/iooew6/daily_general_discussion_september_8_2020/g4h5yyq/
Edit 2 - one day later PolkaProject count is 210. Devs are getting the hint :)
submitted by redditsucks_goruqqus to polkadot_market [link] [comments]

An Intense Pursuit of a Wife, Wealth & Wisdom Rewarded with Charley Donaldson

An Intense Pursuit of a Wife, Wealth & Wisdom Rewarded with Charley Donaldson

An Intense Pursuit of a Wife, Wealth & Wisdom Rewarded with Charley Donaldson
Charley Donaldson is my guest. He’s a long-time friend and serial entrepreneur who has founded or co-founded five companies over the last six years. Today, he spends most of his time at the helm of two early-stage technology startups: CaringBand and DonationScout.
Charley describes himself as a fearless, yet paranoid entrepreneur. He says that he’s abandoned the easier road to career & financial success in search of his true calling.
I’ve known Charlie since we graduated from Cy-Falls High School together in 1998—Charley was our class’ quarterback. After high school, he poll vaulted at LSU before transferring to Baylor. One of the things that drives Charley is ensuring he didn’t peak in high school (no problem to this point).
In this episode, we recall our time at Cy-Falls. I ask him about his rivalry with Langham Creek star quarterback Joseph Smith. And why Charley ultimately chose track & field over football.
Charley’s now a husband, father of three—they live in The Woodlands, TX. We discuss the journey of his startup, CaringBand—from idea to market. Charley says he and his wife created the business after his mother-in-law’s successful battle with breast cancer in 2016.
This conversation was fun. Lotta laughs. Please enjoy!
Other topics discussed:
  • Why Charley decided to pole vault in college
  • The concept of progression
  • The effects of paranoia on Charley [as an entrepreneur]
  • Why athletes make for great entrepreneurs
  • High-net-worth individuals vs ultra HNWIs
  • Importance of vendor-partners in business
  • Crowdfunding by way of Kickstarter
  • CaringBand’s target customers
  • Male / female differences in decision-making
  • Networking after college
  • Charley is a risky investor
  • What it means to “step-up in basis”
  • What Charley’s typical day looks like
  • Charley’s biggest investment mistake
  • His daughter Kate’s brilliant idea
  • Brad’s future travel plans after baby
  • Warren Buffett’s leveraged investing
Questions asked:
  • Did you know coming into 9th grade that you’d be competing with the quarterbacks of other junior highs (Truitt, Watkins, Cook)?
  • What were your prospects of starting?
  • Did you feel a sense of unfairness when you got to 9th grade and you’re competing with guys that were older than you?
  • Did you have any opportunities to play beyond high school?
  • How does a kid decide to become a pole vaulter?
  • Were you recruited by many schools to be their pole vaulter?
  • What makes you paranoid [as an entrepreneur]? What does it lead you to do? How does [paranoia] manifest?
  • Why do you think it’s common for athletes to be entrepreneurs?
  • Can you talk about where the idea for CaringBand came from?
  • What’s considered high-net-worth vs. ultra high-net-worth?
  • When did you realize that you were going to seek outside investors [for CaringBand]?
  • Are there mistakes from other entrepreneurial endeavors that you were able to correct for this [CaringBand] concept?
  • How important is social media marketing?
  • How did you decide to go with Kickstarter?
  • Who’s your ideal customer [for CaringBand]?
  • Do you think it’s male / female differences that led you to a struggle with your wife?
  • Do you think transferring schools helped you to gain connections?
  • What were the conversations like in your house when you decided to become a full-time entrepreneur?
  • What is your overarching investing strategy?
  • Do you invest in any individual stocks?
  • What’s the biggest mistake you’ve ever made, investment-wise?
  • Do you teach your kids about money & investing?
  • Were you conscious about not coddling your kids and exposing them to the negative aspects of life?
  • Do you have to put reins on yourself sometimes from getting too excited/involved as a parent?
  • Have you ever felt an obligation to learn Bitcoin because of your clients?
Fun questions:
  • Is not wanting something as good as having it?
  • Did you have a high school sweetheart?
  • Social media – net positive or net negative for society?
  • When is the first time you logged on to the Internet and what did you do?
  • What is something you’ve learned from your kids that you share the most with people?
  • If somebody dropped $1 million in your lap tomorrow, what would you do with it?
  • If somebody gave you $100,000 tomorrow and forced you to invest in 3 companies: Apple, Amazon, and Tesla – how would you allocate those funds?
  • Same dollar amount, but you’re forced to allocate $100,000 toward gold or Bitcoin – how do you divide that up?
  • Do you have a favorite book?
  • Do you have a favorite podcast?
  • Who’s the best quarterback ever?
  • Overrated/Underrated: Maria Bartiromo, Jim Cramer, Mark Cuban, Randy Yost, DeShaun Watson, Bill O’Brien, Aaron Rogers
Connect with Charley:
submitted by man_overseas to u/man_overseas [link] [comments]

Round up of Cryptocurrency News #2 Week 13/07 - 19/07

Round up of Cryptocurrency News #2 Week 13/07 - 19/07
So much has happened this week! We saw a capitulation point of bitcoin before bears took over and we saw the selling pressure push Bitcoin down toward the $9000USD mark then move back up above $9100USD So far it has been a stable hold, however we may see some more action within the coming weeks.
 
Widespread scamming within the Twitter-sphere, Youtube and other platforms as Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies may seem like fair game. Cryptocurrencies providing big payouts for scammers without the ability for reversals of accounts. Remember if something seems too good to be true, do some research or just plain do not respond/believe it. Stay safe and careful with your funds!
 
On the brightside, there has been even more adoption of cryptocurrencies as rumours of Paypal utilising cryptocurrency has been confirmed as they are developing crypto capabilities. In addition to this we received exciting news at the start of this week about Binance partnering with Swipe (SXP) and offering a debit card to spend BNB, SXP, BTC and BUSD. ( I will be keeping a swift eye on BNB and Swipe as its utilisation as tokens has just increased 43 fold).
 
Positive news for the Bitcoin network as its hashrate reaches all time high which helps to secure the network further even though mining profits have dropped by 50% from the recent halving. If you didn't know already the last Bitcoin will be expected to be mined in 2140 with its difficulty ever increasing and each time securing the network further. Processing units will have to become faster, stronger and most importantly more cost effective to continue to entice miners for the block rewards and further renewable energy practices.
 
Furthermore we can see Central banks and countries discussing and developing Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC). Read more about it here https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/central-bank-digital-currency-cbdc.asp and check out some of the developments in the world above. This shows the popularity and strong nature of cryptocurrencies. As the saying goes "If you cant beat them, JOIN them".
 
Overall, very solid week full of adoption, animation and anticipation. Another post next week for a weekly round up! See you then but in the mean time join us at our Gravychain Discord.
- DISCORD LINK: https://discord.gg/zxXXyuJ 🍕 Bring some virtual pizza to share 🍕
Come have a chat, stimulate a discussion, ask a question or share some knowledge. We are all friendly crypto enthusiasts up for a chat, supportive and want to help each other with knowledge and investments!
Big thanks to our Telegram and My Crypto HQ for the constant news updates! - The Gravychain Collective: https://t.me/gravychain - My Crypto HQ: https://t.me/My_Crypto_HQ
Important/Notable/Highlights:

Special Mentions:
Other:
submitted by IOTAbesomewhere to Gravychain [link] [comments]

Cost basis/income tax calculations for BAT earned from ads

So, seeing posts like this one around here is making me concerned. If I simply have Brave Rewards enabled in my browser, and nothing more - I'm not registered as a creatopublisher, I'm not verified with Uphold, I haven't in any way cashed out my tokens - what in the heck do and don't I have to report on my 1040 to avoid getting stuck in a perjury trap?
Every website and Reddit commentor seems to have a different answer on this. Some of the answers are more clearly in line with IRS guidance than others but in many cases there is no clear sense to be had of which is "more reasonable" than the others. Yet since I've had Brave Rewards enabled since mid-2019, it behooves me to "get this right" when I fill out my 2019 tax return, lest the IRS come down on me for being inconsistent with my answers should I have better answers to these questions in future years.
The IRS is clear on one thing: cryptocurrency, in general, is valuable property and treated much like gold or other non-dollar capital assets (whether or not they're intended or used primarily as "money"). If your employer pays you in bitcoin (or gold, or a car, or a cow, etc.), you owe taxes on that income the day you receive it, whether or not you "cashed it out" by selling it for dollars. The IRS expects you to compute a "cost basis" for the property you received by determining its current "fair market value" in dollars, and that's what you report on your tax return. If and when you sell that property for dollars at any later date, that's a separate transaction, which may or may not incur a capital gain or loss (difference in value you received from the sale vs. what it was worth when you originally got the property), and that is reported in its own line on the 1040 (separate from ordinary income, depending on whether you held the property more or less than 1 year before selling it).
So far, so good - that's all straightforward enough and well-precedented since it's the same thing people are used to doing for other capital goods such as stocks/bonds, precious metals, or real estate. It's even straightforward for people who simply trade crypto as an investment, like Bitcoin or whatever. In that case it's no different (tax-wise) from trading gold, and if you do it through a broker like Coinbase, Uphold, etc. you'll probably get a nice statement at the end of the year that breaks it all down and you can import into TurboTax or whatever.
That's still well and good for those who (like many here) are trading BAT as an investment, like any other crypto.
But Brave Rewards's BAT microtransactions are a whole 'nother level of craziness. If we're just using BAT within the Brave ecosystem - receiving it from ads and tipping/auto-contributing it back to publishers - does it ever enter the world of "capital assets" from my perspective as a user? If so, how the heck do I compute my cost basis? How on earth do I know how my BAT balance breaks down in terms of amounts received on particular days, which I absolutely need to know if I'm going to look up BAT/USD exchange rates online to compute cost basis information? Brave currently doesn't provide any sort of "wallet statement" showing transactions in or out of the browser on a date-stamped basis. I know that's planned for "the future", but that doesn't exactly help me for doing my 2019 taxes.
I realize that Brave cannot give "tax advise" per se, ad nauseum. But surely Brave has done some thinking about the tax implications of BAT/Brave Rewards for ordinary users, versus just saying "have fun explaining this to the IRS" - right? We know that Brave can and does make legal statements about what they believe, as a company based on the advice of their corporate counsel, the legal status of BAT is (see e.g. this answer in the official FAQ).
That, of course, doesn't guarantee that the government will see it that way (or that a judge will), but it's at least helpful to know "some professional lawyers spent a lot of time studying this and think the law says X", because that's a heck of a lot more than us randos on the Internet can guess at. At least if we have some consistent guidance, we can know what our story should be to the IRS and keep it straight, because otherwise we're at the mercy of whatever some auditor or administrative law judge might feel like. Maybe they won't go after most small-fry Brave users today, but you can bet they'll demand answers going back years into the past if one of those users were to become rich, or politically active, or otherwise interesting to the IRS at some point in the future. Taxes, after all, are the one area of the law where citizens are for practical purposes considered guilty (or at least, "liable to pay whatever the IRS demands") until proven innocent. (Sad, but too true.)
My case is the simplest possible one for a Brave Rewards user: I'm a resident U.S. citizen who's never "cashed out" my BAT, I'm not a "publisher" or "creator", I haven't received tips, and I'm not verified with Uphold (couldn't if I wanted to, since they're not licensed in my state). I've only ever made four small tips totaling 40.0 BAT with the initial grant I got from the User Growth Pool when installing Brave (because it was going to expire); I've been hanging onto my non-UGP earnings in the hopes that some of my favorite websites/creators will eventually become verified and I can start spreading the wealth around in a more meaningful way than just dumping it on the 1 or 2 sites I visit that are yet verified.
My questions are thus:
1) Is the BAT I receive from Brave Rewards considered to be a capital asset if I'm not holding it as an investment but just leaving it in the browser to be used as intended there (as a way of funneling ad proceeds from advertisers to publishers)? Does it matter if it stays in the browser and never gets withdrawn to an Uphold account? (e.g. does it then just qualify as "internal functionality of the web browser" and not a meaningful valuable thing I can put a dollar amount on, like a McDonalds Monopoly token with a "cash value" of $0.0001?)
2) If my BAT is considered a capital asset, how do I compute my cost basis for income (and future capital gains/losses) purposes? Is every single microtransaction an "income" transaction with its own separate cost basis that I have to track day-by-day? Or is income only realized when Brave deposits my earnings to my browser on the 5th of the month? Or does it only count if/when I connect an Uphold account and "cash out"?
3) Do I have to answer "Yes" to the new 1040 question asking "did you receive, sell, send, exchange, or otherwise acquire any financial interest in any virtual currency"? (I haven't touched any cryptocurrency in my life besides what I've gotten from Brave Rewards.) Is BAT a "virtual currency" when used strictly within the context of Brave Rewards, or is it something more along the lines of spendable XP points in a video game which have no value (for me, at least) outside that system?
4) If I have to do detailed cost basis reporting, is there any way I can get my Brave browser to cough up some sort of datestamped transaction history for my Rewards? I realize there's no official UI yet, but is there an internal database or something I can dump? (I'm a professional software developer so I'm willing to "get my hands dirty". Heck, I'd be willing to fire up a debugger on a core dump of the browser if that'll help...better that than being liable for tax fraud...)
5) If all else fails, can I escape this blooming mess by just turning off Brave Rewards, forgetting my wallet key (which I've never backed up), bit bucketing the BAT I've so patiently earned over the last year, and never looking back? Is it too late to do so since I've already received the BAT in tax year 2019 (regardless of what I might do with it in 2020, including thus throwing it away)? I realize that in practice I could probably do so and get away with it, but I want to be right with the law here. After all, even if I report nothing on my 2019 tax return regarding crypto, the IRS could always find my posts here on Reddit and say "see, we have proof that you used Brave Rewards in 2019"... Even if I'm a "small fry" at this point in my life that the IRS won't care to go after, I don't want to have a sword of Damocles hanging over my head for them to trigger if and when they feel like it later in life.
Help me my dudes, you're my only hope! ;-) (And I suspect many, many others are quietly freaking out about this too...)
submitted by gemmy0I to BATProject [link] [comments]

[Part 1] KAVA Historical AMA Tracker! (Questions & Answers)

ATTN: These AMA questions are from Autumn 2019 - before the official launch of the Kava Mainnet, and it's fungible Kava Token.
These questions may no longer be relevant to the current Kava landscape, however, they do provide important historical background on the early origins of Kava Labs.
Please note, that there are several repeat questions/answers.

Q1:

Kava is a decentralized DEFI project, why did you implement the countries restrictions to run the node? Will there be such restrictions by the time of the mainnet?

Q2:

According to the project description it has been indicated that staking reward (in KAVA tokens) varies from 3 to 20% per annum. But how will you fight with inflation?

We all know how altcoins prices are falling, and their bottom is not visible. And in fact, we can get an increase in the number of tokens for staking, but not an increase in the price of the token itself and become a long-term investor.

  • Answer: Kava is both inflationary with block rewards, but deflationary when we burn CDP fees. Only stakers who bond their Kava receive inflationary rewards - users and traders on exchanges do not get this. In this way, rewards are inflated, but given to stakers and removed value from the traders who are speculating like a tax. The Deflationary structure of fees should help counterbalance the price drops from inflation if any. In the long-term as more CDPs are used, Kava should be a deflationary asset by design if all things go well

Q3:

In your allocation it is indicated that 28.48% of the tokens are in the "Token treasury" - where will these tokens be directed?

  • Answer: Investors in financing rounds prior to the IEO have entered into long-term lock-up agreements in-line with their belief in Kava’s exciting long-term growth potential and to allow the projects token price to find stability. Following the IEO, the only tokens in circulation will be those sold through the IEO on Binance and the initial Treasury tokens released.
  • No private sale investor tokens are in circulation until the initial release at the end of Q1 2020 and then gradually over the [36] months The initial Treasury tokens in circulation will be used for a mixture of ecosystem grants, the expenses associated with the IEO as well as initial market making requirements as is typical with a listing of this size. Kava remains well financed to execute our roadmap following the IEO and do not envisage any need for any material financings or token sales for the foreseeable future.

Q4:

Such a platform (with loans and stable coins) is just the beginning since these aspects are a small part of many Defi components. Will your team have a plan to implement other functions, such as derivatives, the dex platform once the platform is successfully launched?

  • Answer: We believe Kava is the foundation for many future defi products. We need stable coins, oracles, and other infrastructure first that Kava provides. Once we have that, we can apply these to derivatives and other synthetics more easily. For example, we can use the price feeds and USDX to enable users to place 100x leverage bets with each other. If they both lock funds into payment channels, then they can use a smart contract based on the price feed to do the 100x trade/bet automatically without counter party risk. In this way, Kava can expand its financial product offerings far beyond loans and stable coins in the future.

Q5:

There are several options for using USDX on the KAVA platform, one of which is Margin Trading / Leverage. Is this a selection function or a compulsory function? Wondering since there are some investors who don`t like margin. What is the level of leverage and how does a CDP auction work?

  • Answer: This is a good #Q . Kava simply provides loans to users in USDX stable coins. What the users do is completely up to them. They can use the loans for everyday payments if they like. Leverage and hedging are just the main use cases we foresee - there are many ways people can use the CDP platform and USDX.

Q6:

Most credit platforms do not work well in the current market. What will you do to attract more people to use your platform and the services you provide? Thank you

  • Answer: Most credit platforms do not work well in the current market? I think that isn't correct at least for DeFi. Even in the bear market, MakerDao and Compound saw good user growth. Regardless, our efforts at Kava to build the market are fairly product and BD focused. 1) we build more integrations of assets and expand financial services to attract new communities and users. 2) we focus on building partnerships with high quality teams to promote and build Kava's core user base. Kava is just the developer. Our great partners like Ripple, Stakewith.Us, P2P, Binance - they have the real users that demand Kava. They are like our system integrators that package Kava up nicely and present it to their users. In order to grow, we need to deepen our partnerships and bring in new ones around the world.

Q7:

KAVA functions as a reserve currency in situations where the system is undercollateralized. In such cases new KAVA is minted and used to buy USDX off the market until USDX becomes safely overcollateralized.

Meaning, there will be no max supply of KAVA?

  • Answer: Yes, there is no max supply of Kava.

Q8:

Why Kava?

  • Answer: ...because people are long BTC and the best way to go long BTC without giving up custody is Kava's platform. Because it is MakerDao for bitcoin. Bitcoin has a 10x market cap of ETH and Maker is 10x the size of Kava. I think we're pretty undervalued right now.

Q9:

How do you plan to make liquidity in Kava?

  • Answer: Working with Binance for the IEO and as the first exchange for KAVA to trade on will be a huge boost in increasing the liquidity of trading KAVA.

Q10:

Most crypto investors or crypto users prefer easy transaction and low fees, what can we expect from KAVA about this?

  • Answer: Transaction fees are very low and confirm if seconds. The user experience is quite good on Tendermint-based blockchains.

Q11:

How do I become a note validator on KavA?

Q12:

It is great to know that KAVA is the first DEFI-supported project sponsored by Binance Launchpad, do you think this is the meaning that CZ brings: Opening the DEFI era, as a leader, you feel like how ?

  • Answer: We are the first DeFi platform that Launchpad has supported. We are a very strategic blockchain for major crypto like BNB. Kava's platform will bring more utility to the users of BNB and the Binance DEX. It feels good of course to have validation from the biggest players in the space like Cosmos, Ripple, CZ/Binance, etc.

Q13:

Since decentralized finance applications is already dominating, how do you intend to surpass those leading in the market?

  • Answer: The leaders are only addressing ethereum. BTC, XRP, BNB, ATOM is a much larger set to go after that current players cannot.

Q14:

What does Ripple play in the Kava's ecosystem, since Ripple is like a top tier company and it’s impressive that you are partnered with them?

  • Answer: Ripple is an equity investor in Kava and a big supporter of our work in cross-chain settlement research and implementations. Ripple's XRP is a great asset in terms of users and liquidity that the Kava platform can use. In addition, Ripple's money service business customers are asking for a stable coin for remittances to avoid the currency heading risk that XRP presents. Ripple will not use USDC or other stable coins, but they are open to using USDX as it can be XRP-backed.

Q15:

Considering the connectivity, Libra could be the biggest competitor if KAVA leverages interchain for efficiency.

  • Answer: With regard to USDX, it is important to understand the users interacting with the Kava blockchain have no counterparty that people could go after for legal actions. A user getting a USDX loan has no counterparty. The software holds the collateral and creates the loan. The only laws that would apply are to the very users that are using the system.

Q16:

Wonder how KAVA will compete with the tech giants

  • Answer: Libra is running into extreme issues with the US Senate and regulators. Even the G7-G20 groups are worried. Its important to understand that Libra is effectively a permissioned system. Only big companies that law makers can go after are able to run nodes. In Kava, nodes can be run by anyway and our nodes are based all over the world. It's incredibly hard for a law maker to take down Kava because they would need to find and legally enforce hundreds of business in different jurisdictions to comply. We have an advantage in this way over the larger projects like Libra or Clayton.

Q17:

In long-term, what's the strategy that KAVA has for covering the traditional finance users as well? Especially regarding the "stability"

  • Answer: Technical risk is unavoidable for DeFi. Only time will tell if a system is trustworthy and its never 100% that it will not fail or be hacked. This is true with banks and other financial systems as well. I think for DeFi, the technical risk needs to be priced in to the expected returns to compensate the market. DeFi does have a better user experience - requiring no credit score, identity, or KYC over centralized solutions.
  • With our multi-collateral CDP system, even with it overcollateralized, people can get up to 3x leverage on assets. Take 100 USD in BTC, get a USDX loan for 66 USDX, then buy $66 BTC and do another loan - you can do this with a program to get 3x leverage with the same risk profile. This is enough for most people.
  • However, it will be possible once we have Kava's CDP platform to extend it into products that offer undercollateralized financial products. For example, if USER 1 + USER 2 use payment channels to lock up their USDX, they can use Kava's price feeds to place bets between each other using their locked assets. They can bet that for every $1 BTC/USD moves, the other party owes 3x. In this way we can even do 100x leverage or 1000x leverage and create very fun products for people to trade with. Importantly, even in places where margin trading is regulated and forbidden, Kava's platform will remain open access and available.

Q18:

In long-term, what's the strategy that KAVA has for covering the traditional finance users as well? Especially regarding the "stability"

  • Answer: Kava believes that stable coins should be backed not just by crypto or fiat, but any widely used, highly liquid asset. We think in the future the best stablecoin would be backed by a basket of very stable currencies that include crypto and fiat or whatever the market demands.

Q19:

Compound, maker they're trying to increase their size via the competitive interests rates. THough it shows good return in terms of growth rate, still it's for short-term. Wonder other than financial advantage, KAVA has more for the users' needs?

  • Answer: Robert, the CEO of Compound is an investor and advisor to Kava. We think what Compound does with money markets is amazing and hope to integrate when they support more than just Ethereum assets. Kava's advantage vs others is to provide basic DeFi services like returns on crypto and stable coins today when no other platform offers that. Many platforms support ETH, but no platform can support BTC, XRP, BNB, and ATOM in a decentralized way without requiring centralized custody of these assets.

Q20:

The vast majority of the cryptocurrency community's priorities is symbolic pricing. When prices rise, the community rejoices and grows. When they fall, many people begin to cast in a negative way. How will KAVA solve the negative problem when the price goes down? What is your plan to strengthen and develop the community to persuade more people to look at the product than the price?

  • Answer: We believe price is an important factor for faith in the market. One of Kava's key initiatives was selecting only long-term partners that are willing to work with kava for 2 years. That is why even after 6 months, 0 private investor or kava team tokens will be liquid on the market.
  • We believe not in fast pumps and then dumps that destroy faith, but rather we try and operate the best we can for long-term sustainable growth over time. It's always hard to control factors in the market, and some factors are out of our control such as BTC price correlations, etc - however, we treat this like a public company stock - we want long-term growth of Kava and try to make sure our whole community of Kava holders is aligned with that the best we can.

Q21:

Do you have any plans to attract non-crypto investors to Kava and how? What are the measures to increase awareness of kava in non-crypto space?

  • Answer: We are 100% focused on crypto, not the general market. We solve the problems of crypto traders and investors - not the average grandma who needs a payment solution. Kava is geared for decentralized leverage and hedging.

Q22:

Adoption is crucial for all projects and crypto companies, what strategy are you gonna use/follow or u are now following to get Kava adopted and used by many people all over the world?

Revenue is an important aspect for all projects in order to survive and keep the project/company up and running for long term, what are the ways that Kava generates profits/revenue and what is its revenue model?

  • Answer: We have already partnered with several large exchanges, long-term VCs, and large projects like Ripple and Cosmos. These are key ways for us to grow our community. As we build support for more assets, we plan to promote Kava's services to those new communities of traders.
  • Kava generates revenue as more people use the platform. As the platform is used, KAVA tokens are burned when users pay stability fees. This deflates the total supply of Kava and should in most cases give rise to the value of KAVA like a stock-buyback in the public markets.

Q23:

In order to be success in Loan project of Cryptocurrency, I think marketing is very important to make people using this service without any registration. What is main strategy for marketing?

  • Answer: Our main strategy is to build a great experience and offer products that are not available to communities with demand. Currently no DeFi products can serve BTC users for example. Centralized exchanges can, but nothing truly trustless. Kava's platform can finally give the vast audiences of BTC, BNB, and ATOM holders access to core DeFi services they cannot get on their own due to the smart contract limitations of those platforms.

Q24:

Currently, some project have policies for their ambassadors to create a contribution and attract recognition for the project! So the KAVA team plans to implement policies and incentives for KAVA ambassadors?

  • Answer: Yes, we will be creating a KAVA ambassador program and releasing that soon. Please follow our social media channels to learn about it in the coming weeks.

Q25:

Currently there are so many KAVA tokens sold on exchanges, why is this happening while KAVA is going to IEO on Binance? Are those KAVA codes fake or not?

  • Answer: For everyone's safety, please understand Kava tokens do not exist yet and they will only exist starting with the Binance IEO. Any other token listings or offerings of Kava are not supported by Kava Labs and I highly discourage you all from trying to get them there. It is most likely a big scam. Please only trust Binance for this.

Q26:

KAVA have two tokens, the first is called Kava - a governance and staking token; the second is called USDX - an algorithmically managed crypto-backed stable coin. What are the advantages of USDX compared to other stablecoins such as: USDT, USDC, TUSD, GUSD, ...?

  • Answer: USDX is one of the few stablecoins to be fully backed by crypto-assets. This means that we do not deal with fiat to back the value, and thus we don't have some of the issues when it comes to storing fiat funds with banks and custodians. This also makes our product fully digital and built for the future of crypto growth.

Q27:

As a CEO, does your background in Esports and Gaming industry help anything to your management and development of KAVA Labs?

  • Answer: Esports no. But having been a multi-time venture-backed foundeCEO and have gone through the start-up phase before has made creating and running a 2nd company easier. Right now Kava is still small, Fnatic had over 80 employees. It was at a larger scale. I would say developing software is much more than doing the hardware at fnaticgear.com

Q28:

Why did Kava choose to launch IEO on Binance and not other exchanges like: Kucoin, Houbi, Gate, ....?

  • Answer: Kava had a lot of interest from exchanges to partner with for IEO. We decided based on a lot of factors such as userbase, diverse exposure across multiple regions and countries, and an amazing team that provides so much insight into so many communities such as this one. Binance has been a tremendous partner and we also look forward to continuing our partnership far into the future.

Q29:

Currently if Search on coinmarketcap has 3 types of stablecoins bearing the USDX symbol (but these 3 stablecoins are no information). So, what will KAVA do to let users know that Kava's USDX is another stablecoin?

  • Answer: All these USDX have no volume or listings. We will be on Binance. I am not worried.

Q30:

In addition to the Token Allocation for Binance Launchpad, what is the Token Treasury in the Initial Circulating Supply?

  • Answer: This is controlled by Kava Labs, but with the big cash we have saved from fundraising, we see no reason why these tokens would be sold on the market. The treasury tokens are for use in grants, ecosystem growth initiatives, development, and other incentive programs to drive adoption of the platform.

Q31:

How you will compete with your competitors? Currently i don't see much but for future how you will maintain this consistency ? No doubt it is Great and Unique project, what is the main problem that #KAVA is currently facing?

  • Answer: Because our industry is just starting out, I don't like to think of them as our direct competitors. We are all working to grow the size of the pie rather than get a larger slice from a small pie. The one thing that we believe will allow us to stand apart is the community we are building. Being able to utilize our own community along with Cosmos and our other partners like Binance for the IEO, we have a strong footing to get a lot of early users onto our platform. Also, we are also focusing on growing Kava internationally particularly Asia. We hope to build our platform for an even larger userbase than just the west.

Q32:

How do you explain your project to a random person who has never heard of your project?

  • Answer: non-crypto = Kava is a lending platform for users of cryptocurrencies.
  • crypto = Kava is a cross-chain DeFi platform for loans and stablecoins backed by BTC, BNB, XRP, ATOM and other major cryptocurrencies.

Q33:

Will KAVA team have a plan on implementing DAO module on your platform since its efficiency on autonomy, decentralization and transparency?

  • Answer: All voting is already transparent on the Kava blockchain. We approved a number of proposals on our test net.

Q34:

how to use usdx token :only for your platform or you have plan to use usdx for payment ?

  • Answer: Payments is a nice use case, but demand for crypto payments is still small. We may choose to focus here later if demand for crypto payments increases. Currently it is quite small with the bulk of use remaining in trading and speculative use cases.

Q35:

Do you have plans to spread KAVA ecosystem across other continents. if yes, what are the strategies and how can I as a community member contribute to making it possible?

  • Answer: We are already across many continents - I don't think we are in antarctica yet. Africa might be light on nodes as well. I think as we grow on major exchanges like Binance, new node operators will get interested and help decentralize Kava further.

Q36:

Maker's CDP lending system is on top in this market and its Dominance is currently sitting on 64.90 % , how kava will compete will maker and compound?

  • Answer: adding assets like bitcoin which have more value and more users than ETH. It's a bigger market that Maker cannot compete with Kava in.

Q37:

Currently, the community is too concerned about the price. As prices rise, the community rejoice and grow, when falling, many people start throwing negatively. So what is KAVA's solution to getting people to focus on the project rather than the price of the token?

What is your plan to strengthen and grow the community to persuade more individuals to look at the product than the price?

  • Answer: We also share similar concerns as price and price direction is always a huge factor in the crypto industry. A lot of people of course are very short-term focused on flipping for bigger profits. One of the solutions, and what Kava has done, is to make sure that everything structured is for the long-term. So that makes sure that our investors and employees are all focused on long-term gains and growth. Locking vesting periods are part of that alignment. Another thing is that we at Kava are very transparent in our progress and development. We will be regularly posting updates within our own communities to allow our users and followers to keep up with everything we're up to. Please follow us or look at our github if you're interested!

Q38:

How did Kava get on Piexgo?

  • Answer: We did not work with Piexgo. We have not distributed tokens to any exchange other than Binance. I cannot speak to what is going on there, but I would be very wary of what is happening there.

Q39:

Why was the 1st round price so much lower than the current price

  • Answer: It is natural to worry that early investors got better pricing and could dump on the market. I can assure you that our investors are in this for the long-term. All private sale rounds signed 2 year contracts to run validators - and if they don't they forfeit their tokens. You can compare our release schedule to any other project. We have one of the most restricted circulating supply schedules of any project EVER and its because all our investors are commiting to the long-term success of the project and believe in Kava.
  • About the pricing itself - it is always a function of traction like for any start-up. When we made our public announcement about the project in June, we were only a 4 man team with just some github code. We could basically run a network with a single node, our own. Which is relatively worthless. I think our pricing of Kava at this time was justified. We were effectively a seed-stage company without a product or working network.
  • By July we made severe progress on the development side and the business side. We successful launched our first test net with the help of over 70 validator business partners around the world. We had a world-wide network of hundreds of people supporting us with people and resources at this point and the risk we would fail in launching a working product was much lower. At this point, the Kava project was valued at $25M. At this point, we had many VCs and investors asking for Kava tokens that we turned away. We only accepted validators that would help us launch the network. It was our one and only goal.
  • Fast forward to today, the IEO price simply reflects the traction and market demand for Kava. Our ecosystem is much larger than it was even a month ago. We have support from Ripple, Cosmos, and Binance amongst other large crypto projects. We have 100+ validators securing our network with very sophisticated high-availability set-ups. In addition, our ecosystem partners have built products for Kava - such as block explorers and others are working on native integrations to wallets and exchanges. Launchpad will be very big for us. Kava is a system designed to cater to crypto traders and investors and in a matter of days we distributed via Binance Launchpad and put in the hands of 130+ countries and tens of thousands of users overnight. It doesn't get more DeFi than that.

Q40:

What is the treasury used for?

  • Answer: Kava's treasury is for ecosystem growth activities.
  • Investors in financing rounds prior to the IEO have entered into long-term lock-up agreements in-line with their belief in Kava’s exciting long-term growth potential and to allow the projects token price to find stability. Following the IEO, the only tokens in circulation will be those sold through the IEO on Binance and the initial Treasury tokens released. No private sale investor tokens are in circulation until the initial release at the end of Q1 2020 and then gradually over the [36] months The initial Treasury tokens in circulation will be used for a mixture of ecosystem grants, the expenses associated with the IEO as well as initial market making requirements as is typical with a listing of this size. Kava remains well financed to execute our roadmap following the IEO and do not envisage any need for any material financings or token sales for the foreseeable future.

Q41:

Everyone have heard about the KAVA token, and read about it. But it would be great to hear your explanation about it. What is the Kava token, what is it's utility? :)

  • Answer: The Kava token plays many roles. KAVA is the native staking token of the Kava blockchain and is used for securing the network. KAVA is delegated to validators, basically professional node operators that run highly-available servers to secure the Kava blockchain. The top 100 validators by weight of staked KAVA earn block rewards that range from 3-20% APR based on the total amount staked in the network. These rewards are split between the validators and the KAVA holders.
  • When users of the platform repay their loans, they must a stability fee (a percentage of the loan) in KAVA tokens. These tokens are burned by the system, effectively deflating the total supply overtime as more users use the CDP system.
  • KAVA is also the primary token used in governance of the platform. KAVA token holders can vote on key system parameter changes and upgrades such as what assets to support, how much USDX in total can be loaned by the system, what the debt-to-collateral ratio needs to be, the stability fees, etc. KAVA holders have a very important responsibility to govern the system well.
  • Lastly, Kava functions as a "Lender of Last Resort" meaning if USDX ever gets undercollateralized because the underlying asset prices drop suddenly and the system manages it poorly, KAVA is inflated in these emergency situations and used to purchase USDX off the market until USDX reaches a state of being over collateralized again. KAVA holders have incentive to only support the good high quality assets so risk of the system is managed responsibly.

Q42:

No matter how perfect and technically thought-out a DeFi protocol is, it cannot be completely protected from any unplanned situations (such as extreme market fluctuations, some legal issues, etc.)

Ecosystem members, in particular the validators on whom KAVA relies on fundamental decision-making rights, should be prepared in advance for any "critical" scenario. Considering that, unlike the same single-collateral MakerDAO, KAVA will be a multi-collateral CDP system, this point is probably even more relevant here.

In this regard, please answer the following question: Does KAVA have a clear risk management model or strategy and how decentralized is / will it be?

  • Answer: Simialar to other CDP systems and MakerDAO we do have a system freeze function where in cases of extreme issues, we can stop the auction mechanisms and return all collateral.

Q43:

Did you know that "Kava" is translated into Ukrainian like "Coffee"? I personally do love drinking coffee. I plunge into the fantasy world. Why did you name your project "Kava" What is the story behind it? What idea / fantasy did your project originate from, which inspired you to create it?

  • Answer: Kava is coffee to you.
  • Kava is Hippopotamus to Japanese.
  • Cava is a region in Spain
  • Kava is also a root that is used in tea which makes your mouth numb.
  • Kava is also crow in Hindi.
  • Kava last but not least is a DeFi platform launching on Binance :)
  • We liked the sound of Kava it was as simple as that. It doesn't have much meaning in the USA where I am from. But it's short sweet and when we were just starting, Kava.io was available for a reasonable price

Q44:

What incentives does a lender get if a person chooses to pay with KAVA? Is there a discount on interest rates on the loan amount if you pay with KAVA? Do I have to pass the KYC procedure to apply for a small loan?

  • Answer: There is no KYC for Kava. Its an open blockchain software platform where anyone with a computer can connect to it and use it.

Q45:

Let's say, I decided to bond my cryptocurrency and got USDX stable coins. For now, it`s an unknown stable coin (let's be honest). Do you plan to add USDX to other famous exchanges? Also, you have spoken about the USDX staking and that the percentage would be higher than for other stable coins. Please be so kind to tell us what is the average annual interest rate and what are the conditions of staking?

  • Answer: Yes we have several large exchanges willing to support USDX from the start. Binance/Binance-DEX is one you should all know ;)
  • The average annual rates for USDX will depend on market conditions. The rate is actually provided by the CDP fees users pay. The system reallocates a portion of those fees to USDX users. In times when USDX use needs to grow, the rates will be higher to incentivize use. When demand is strong, we can reduce the rates.

Q46:

Why should i use and choose Kava's loan if i can use the similar margin trade on Binance?

  • Answer: If margin is available to you and you trust the exchange then you should do whatever is cheaper. For a US citizen and others, margin is often not available and if it is, only for a few asset types as collateral. Kava aims to address this and offer this to everyone.

Q47:

The IEO price is $ 0.46 while the price of the first private sale is $ 0.075. Don't you think that such price gap can negatively affect the liquidity of the token and take away the desire to buy a token on the exchange?

  • Answer: It is natural to worry that early investors got better pricing and could dump on the market. I can assure you that our investors are in this for the long-term. All private sale rounds signed 2 year contracts to run validators - and if they don't they forfeit their tokens. You can compare our release schedule to any other project. We have one of the most restricted circulating supply schedules of any project EVER and its because all our investors are commiting to the long-term success of the project and believe in Kava.
  • About the pricing itself - it is always a function of traction like for any start-up. When we made our public announcement about the project in June, we were only a 4 man team with just some github code. We could basically run a network with a single node, our own. Which is relatively worthless. I think our pricing of Kava at this time was justified. We were effectively a seed-stage company without a product or working network.
  • By July we made severe progress on the development side and the business side. We successful launched our first test net with the help of over 70 validator business partners around the world. We had a world-wide network of hundreds of people supporting us with people and resources at this point and the risk we would fail in launching a working product was much lower. At this point, the Kava project was valued at $25M. At this point, we had many VCs and investors asking for Kava tokens that we turned away. We only accepted validators that would help us launch the network. It was our one and only goal.
  • Fast forward to today, the IEO price simply reflects the traction and market demand for Kava. Our ecosystem is much larger than it was even a month ago. We have support from Ripple, Cosmos, and Binance amongst other large crypto projects. We have 100+ validators securing our network with very sophisticated high-availability set-ups. In addition, our ecosystem partners have built products for Kava - such as block explorers and others are working on native integrations to wallets and exchanges. Launchpad will be very big for us. Kava is a system designed to cater to crypto traders and investors and in a matter of days we distributed via Binance Launchpad and put in the hands of 130+ countries and tens of thousands of users overnight. It doesn't get more DeFi than that.
  • TLDR - I think KAVA is undervalued and the liquid supply of tokens is primarily from the IEO so its a safer bet than other IEOs. If the price drops, it will be from the overall market conditions or fellow IEO users not due private sale investors or team sell-offs.

Q48:

Can you introduce some information abouts KAVA Deflationary Fee Structure? With the burning mechanism, does it mean KAVA will never reach its max supply?

  • Answer: When loans are repaid, users pay a fee in Kava. This is burned. However, Kava does not have a max supply. It has a starting supply of 100M. It inflates for block rewards 3-20% APR AND it inflates when the system is at risk of under collateralization. At this time, more Kava is minted and used to purchase USDX off the market until it reaches full collateralization again.
  • TLDR: If things go well, and governance is good, Kava deflates and hopefully appreciates in value. If things go wrong, Kava holders get inflated.

Q49:

In your opinion what are advantage of decentralized finance over centralized?

  • Answer: One of the main advantages is not needing to pay the costs of regulation and compliance. Open financial software that is usable by anyone removes middle men fees and reduces the barrier for new entrants to enter and make new products. Also DeFI has an edge in terms of onboarding - to get a bank account or an exchange account you need to do lots of KYC and give private info. That takes time and is troublesome. With DeFi you just load up your funds and transact. Very fast user flows.

Q50:

Plan, KAVA how to raise capital? Kava is being supported by more than 100 business entities around the world, including major cryptocurrency investment funds like Ripple and Cosmos, so what did kava do to convince investors to join the project?

  • Answer: We have been doing crypto research and development for years. Ripple and Cosmos were partners before we even started this blockchain with Kava Labs. When we announced Kava the DeFi platform they knew us already to do good work and they liked the idea so they support us.
submitted by Kava_Mod to KavaUSDX [link] [comments]

Weekly Update: Jason starts #discussionThursday, $COTI on Binance, WibsonTree, Harmony + IBC Media... – 21 Feb - 27 Feb'20

Weekly Update: Jason starts #discussionThursday, $COTI on Binance, WibsonTree, Harmony + IBC Media... – 21 Feb - 27 Feb'20
Hiya folks! With this update we will finally be 100% caught up with the latest. Let’s go! Here’s your week at Parachute + partners (21 Feb - 27 Feb'20):

As mentioned 2 weeks back, Alexis announced the start of a new style of raffle from this week. 300k $PAR in the pot to be won! Bose hosted a Friday Quiz in TTR on movies with a 10k $PAR prize pool. Cap shared a unique bit of trivia from the tipbotverse: ChangeTip, a bitcoin tipbot launched 7 years back, was acquired by Airbnb in 2016 that led to its closure. A crypto pioneer that was way ahead of its time. The usual suspects continue to be on top of the Fantasy Premier Leagure (#FPL) leaderboard – LordHades, Alexis and Novelcloud as per the latest update shared by LH. Alejandro hosted a gun-mode CoD game in the Parachute War Zone followed by a free-for-all for $PAR prizes. Tavo announced another CoD Battle Royale in the Parachute War Zone to be held next week. Afful’s TTR trivia was fun as always. Charlotte hosted another trivia in TTR as well for a 10k $PAR prize pool. Victor held one in TTR with another 10k $PAR pot as well. GamerBoy’s trivia in TTR this week was based on Kindergarten Geography. Haha! Belated Birthday wishes to Victor. Two-for-Tuesdays by Gian for this week had the theme rap/reggae/reggaeton. Like last week, Sebastian set up a YouTube playlist to compile all the entries. For #wholesomewed, Parachuters put on their creative hats as they made some epic artwork based on a primary shape shared by Jason. So much talent! There’s $PAR to be won! In the latest project update shared by Cap, ParJar is in final stages of testing with Transak, ParJar integrated coin-swaps are being worked on at the moment and $PAR-based Dex to be launched in the coming weeks in partnership with Switch. Jason launched a new event for Thursdays called #discussionThursday from this week. The first discussion series revolved around "something you don't understand". The goal is "hopefully someone that does understand it can explain it". Good conversations and altruism gets $PAR tips. TTR crew hosted a fun “guess the admin” contest based on the Parachute Christmas artwork.
Lmao Victor!
Happy Carnival to you too Rene
Just a sampling from all the #wholesomewed entries
20k $AXPR was burned as part of the weekly aXpire burn event. aXpire COO Matthew Markham wrote about how technological differentiators give PEs an edge over public markets. The latest Bilr blog post talks about disruptive technologies in the legal industry. 2gether CEO Ramon Ferraz appeared in an IEB podcast to talk about Neobanks. YouTuber FunOntheRide’s latest video covers collaborative economy and how 2gether plays a role in it. Head of Marketing, Laura Braulio explained must-do’s in marketing strategies for fintechs in her article which was published on ClickZ. The XIO DApp went into the final stages of unit testing this week. Beta tests should start soon. For #XIOSocial chatter, Citizens discussed the semantics of the term “crowdstaking”. Ethos’ parent company Voyager released the full Android version of its app this week. Switch-backed McAfeeDex is slated for some updates soon. Read about what’s coming up from John McAfee’s tweet. Plus, a new privacy coin “ghost” is on the horizon. $ESH holders are expected to get a taste of it on launch. For the latest update on Switch, click here. Fantom’s $FTM was one of the winners of a public vote to get listed on ZelCore. As an update to the fantom.rocks tool released last week by GoFantom (a Fantom validator), this week a dApp named Supercharge was released on top of it. Supercharge allows users to send 20 test transactions to demonstrate the speed of consensus. The DAO Maker shared a compilation of Fantom’s 2019 updates. For the 2020 project plan, click here. This was followed by a detailed 2020 roadmap. Too long? No sweat! This graphical representation of the roadmap by Generation Crypto is here to rescue you. Or, if you would rather watch a video, CMO Michael Chen made one. For notes, click here. The first version of Uptrennd’s mobile redesign is here. Congratulations to TREOS for winning the Round 1 of the Uptrennd free advertising package contest that launched last week. Voting for Round 2 started this week with Fantom included in this round. Banano ended up winning the second round and going head to head with TREOS in the finals. The first 2UP Tuesday kicked off this week with every upvote counting for twice the normal points (with the same rules applying for downvotes). Sweet! Uptrennd founder Jeff Kirdeikis was invited to speak at the EntrepreneurShip cruise event. Don’t forget the epic giveaway mentioned.
First sneak peek of Uptrennd’s new mobile design
Catch up on Distric0x’s Weekly update here. If you missed the DappDigest, the crew’s got your back. Their video walkthrough of ETHDenver covers snippets from the event along with Brady’s on-stage performance and an interview of Dmitry Buterin (Vitalik Buterin’s father). Read about how the recent fintech M&A deals will influence markets in this article by Hydrogen. The team sat down for an AMA with Crypto Cabital this week and also hosted a 150k $HYDRO giveaway. Fintech nerds, check out Hydro’s explainer blog post on open banking and WSO2. Is the project ticking off its roadmap items on time? Click here to find out. As a 2020 cohort member of the MassChallenge Fintech accelerator, Hydro’s Senior Director for Strategic Partnerships, Ken Kavanaugh travelled to Boston to talk about “platformication in fintech” at their meetup. If you are attending the Milwaukee Blockchain Conference in March, don’t forget to say Hi to Biz Dev Lead Mark Anstead where he will be a featured speaker. If you haven’t booked your tickets yet, there’s a 50% discount coupon available for you. $HYDRO got listed on DeFi aggregator Totle this week. How does Sentivate aim to solve HTTP / TCP bottlenecks? Click here to find out. For a primer on UDSP, click here. The Mycro Hunter landing page went live this week. OST’s Pepo is the official community app and partner of Europe-based Ethereum Community Conference (EthCC) where it will also be collaborating with Epicenter podcast for the event. The first browser version of Pepo was released. Crypto exchange Mine Digital will be joining SelfKey’s exchange marketplace. SelfKey’s R&D team shared a 2020 update on the identity management space and how the project aims to place itself in this segment.
Early preview of the SelfKey Mobile Wallet to be submitted to App Store for review
For the latest Constellation community update, click here. Don’t forget to send in your questions for the AMA happening next week. Attendees of VeneCoiners meetup in Argentina next week, don’t forget to say Hi to the crew from Wibson who will be presenting the Rewards Marketplace at the event. The team also published a paper on “WibsonTree” which preserves data privacy when interacting with an agent. They hosted an Ethereum meetup this week to discuss DeFi. Here’s a video demo of how fast the Harmony mainnet is. The weekly #pow tweet thread summarises updates from across the team. KuCoin’s $ONE token swap is now complete. A new page was launched to monitor mainnet and testnet status. The crew attended a Binance meetup in Ukraine to talk about latest project updates. Harmony announced a partnership with IBC Media to incubate and accelerate Indian fintech startups. Safe Haven’s digital inheritance solution, Inheriti, will be available on the Harmony chain. $ONE was listed on MathWallet. Intellishare co-founder Nicholas Wan shared a sneak peek of the testnet mobile UI. dGen listed GET Protocol’s GUTS Tickets as one of the notable startups in the Dutch blockchain space in their Blockchain in Europe 2020 Review report. For a project overview click here – nicely summarised by Generation Crypto. GUTS will be ticketing 3 new shows of Chef’Special. Global Crypto Alliance live streamed another demo of its IoT prototype smartlock device being operated through $CALL tokens. The team also hosted a fun quiz on their Telegram this week. YouTuber Crypto Rich interviewed the crew on all things $CALL (Part I, Part II). Nik Patel’s detailed research report on COTI was published this week. $COTI was added to the Staking Rewards platform. And here’s a biggie, Binance listed both the ERC20 and BEP2 versions of the token this week with a bonus airdrop for deposits. Woot! Before the listing frenzy started, the team took a moment to take stock of the situation. A big listing like Binance leads to a lot of new eyeballs that could trigger scams. COTI crew shared their anti-scam guide for this reason. DOMSCRYPTO covered the project in their latest video. DoYourTip was covered in an iHODL news feature.

And with that, we close for this week at Parachute. See you again with another update. Ciao!
submitted by abhijoysarkar to ParachuteToken [link] [comments]

Risks/Rewards Of Bitcoin Cash

Recently, I have been thinking a lot about cryptocurrencies. As Satoshi Nakamoto said, "Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own."
When you cut off one head, 2 more will grow in its place. And the BTC vs Bitcoin Cash fork is exactly what happened on 1st Aug 2017. The good news is that Bitcoin Cash has survived and proved its anti-fragility properties. Bitcoin Cash continues its goal as "A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System", as specified in the original Bitcoin whitepaper. Betting against Bitcoin Cash is like betting against Bitcoin in the early years.
In fact, Bitcoin Cash had made such huge progress in the last 2 years, thanks to the extremely talented developers, that the value proposition of Bitcoin Cash has grown multifold. I have no doubt that the prices of cryptocurrencies are heavily manipulated, with no exception to Bitcoin Cash. If some malicious actors wanted to sabotage Bitcoin Cash, they will suppress the prices so that people feel disheartened by it. Evidence of constant trolling, seemingly paid propaganda campaigns, harassments against the Bitcoin Cash community has added weight to this suspicion. And that is why, I have decided to write this article about the risk/reward and share my opinions about Bitcoin Cash.
Let's get right to it. In my opinion, here are the 3 biggest risk factors concerning Bitcoin Cash.
1) Tether Implosion - With the New York AG case hanging over Bitfinex/Tethers, I expect unusually high volatility as the bad guys tries to milk as much money (liquidating longs/shorts) as they can while the court case is still ongoing. However, I expect New York AG to win the case eventually, and the massive loss of confidence in the space will affect the entire crypto space very badly.
2) Hostile Regulatory Climate - Some governments may try to ban cryptocurrencies outright, such as India. Ironically, these countries will be the ones shooting themselves in the foot because the crypto innovations and money will prosper in the more welcoming countries. Given that the crypto space is easily influenced by such news, there may be price dumps in the short term due to such regulatory actions.
3) Malicious Actors Infiltrating BCH Community - Just because it had happened before doesn't mean it won't happen again. Splitting the community is one of the ways to hurt the value proposition of a cryptocurrency. Afterall, it's the community that gives the cryptocurrency its value.
I'm a big fan of Warren Buffett when it comes to value investing. He likes to say, he wished the prices were lower so that he could buy them cheaper. Value investors are always on the lookout for undervalued stocks, buy low sell high. The last few days, I had scooped up as many undervalued Bitcoin Cash as I could, and it felt incredibly liberating. It felt truly awesome knowing that you, and only you, has total control over this new p2p magic Internet money. With BTC, you need to worry about unspendable funds due to insufficient fees. With fiat money, you need to worry about hyperinflation due to corrupt government. With Bitcoin Cash, you never have such worries with your own money.
In my opinion, here are the things going for Bitcoin Cash.
1) Bitcoin Cash has much better fundamentals (Privacy - CashShuffle, Tokens - SLP/Wormhole/etc, Cash Accounts, Utility - Medium of Exchange, Oracles - Sports Betting, etc) than BTC. In other words, this means both the floor and ceiling price for Bitcoin Cash will be much higher than BTC. It may take some time to catch up, but it seems inevitable given Bitcoin Cash's current progress and trajectory. If BTC could reach $20k, then Bitcoin Cash's ceiling could well be multiple times that. This means Bitcoin Cash has a much more attractive risk/reward ratio compared to obselete coins like BTC. In my opinion, BTC is for short term gambling/speculation while Bitcoin Cash is more fundamentals based investment.
2) Bitcoin Cash's Halving is coming within a few months, around 8th April 2020. This means less supply which, based on historic data, usually leads to growing prices.
3) The global money supply is around $75 trillion dollars. With Bitcoin Cash's marketcap of $5 billion dollars currently, and its goals as a medium of exchange, $75 trillion will give us plenty of room to grow into. Even if we consider shadow banking, which Bitcoin Cash is well suited for, that's around $50 trillion dollars. That's a lot of room to grow into so again, the risk/reward ratio is too attractive for me to pass up.
4) Bitcoin Cash is my insurance policy. Most people didn't know that the average lifespan of a fiat currency is only 27 years nor do they know fiat currency such as US dollars had lost over 90% of its purchasing power in mere decades. If it could happen to once properous countries such as Venezuela or Greece or Argentina or even powerful nations such as America, it could happen to any country. Of if there is a war, how am I going to carry the gold bar across the border without getting robbed by the borders officers? Bitcoin Cash is my insurance policy to be able to seek refuge in a safe country and protect my loved ones from poverty when such precarious situations happens.
5) I think Bitcoin Cash is still in the very early adopters period. It's exactly like Bitcoin back in 2010 where only a small group of folks know what's up. Back then, when you talk about Bitcoin to people, they had all these wrong impressions due to their lack of understanding about it. Likewise, when you talk about Bitcoin Cash now even in the crypto space alone, you can see people with wrong impressions due to their lack of understanding about it. Some see this as a problem, I see this as an opportunity to be ahead of the crowd and accumulate more Bitcoin Cash!
One of the things I learnt from people like Jack Ma is that if you do what everyone else is doing, you're going to get what everyone else is getting, average results. Value investors educate themselves and are ahead of the curve. So I am not even mad at the propaganda against Bitcoin Cash, because it helps value investors like myself get as much Bitcoin Cash at as low a price point as possible ahead of the pack. Thanks to those trolls costantly spreading lies and propaganda against Bitcoin Cash, because if not for them, I would have left so much more money on the table while buying those same amount of Bitcoin Cash.
6) The Bitcoin Cash community is awesome. What can I say, so many incredibly smart and passionate folks making a difference in shaping the future of money. I think it's worth repeating that what gives cryptocurrency its value is because of its community. If I am going to put my money on something, one of the driving factors is definitely the awesome community.
7) Let's do some Math about BTC. Miners need to sell their BTC to pay for electricity. 6 (blocks/hour) * 24 (hours) * 12.5 (block reward) * $12000 * 30 (days/month) is equal to $648 million dollars per month required just to sustain the BTC price. Do you really believe there is $648 million dollars each month or about $8 billion dollars a year of new money coming into BTC? Really? I am not sure anyone with so much money is that stupid to buy BTC. And even so, it merely sustains the BTC price at $12000. If the price goes up to $20k, you need more than 1 billion dollars of new money coming in every single month! On the other hand, Bitcoin Cash just needs $16 million dollars per month to grow, which looks much more sustainable to me.
BTC Maximalists loves shouting how BTC will get to a million dollars, as if repeating over and over what they hope to be true, will make it come true. Sheeps follow these lies without thinking for themselves. They seems to believe that by repeating a lie or name calling (bcash) long enough, it will become reality. I leave you this quote from Michael Burry (The Big Short), "People want an authority to tell them how to value things, but they choose this authority not based on facts or results. They choose it because it feels authoritative and familiar."
With Bitcoin Cash, there is no authority nor maximalists telling you what you can or cannot do. I see Bitcoin Cash as the people's money and having Bitcoin Cash gives me the feeling of solidarity with commoners around the world. Everytime I read about how badly some governments treated their own citizens, it makes me buy more Bitcoin Cash with a passion. Unlike other cryptocurrencies such as BTC which depends on lies and propaganda to sustain its price, Bitcoin Cash survives based on merits and fundamentals and putting power back into the peoples hands. I hold Bitcoin Cash with a happy clear conscience and sleep well at night. Bitcoin Cash is betting against dumb money (aka lambo/moon bois) and soon enough, we will know just how dumb that money really is.
Sorry about the wall of text. It was an accumulation of days of thoughts and self reflection.
submitted by MobTwo to btc [link] [comments]

Some words of wisdom....

I've been an investor in the stock market for the last 20 years. Prior to that, I was a finance major in college. I'm presuming with the talk of 'lambos' 'hodl' and 'to the moon', that the typical crypto investor skews young (most 45 year olds don't talk that way - but that's ok. Times change).
What doesn't change, whether you are investing in stocks, gold or crypto are the fundamentals of investing. Investing in whatever commodity is driven by a couple of factors - emotion and factors that directly impact the value of the commodity.
Now, that doesn't mean every commodity should be reviewed with the same metrics, or the allocation of emotion vs factors remains the same for each. But both are still true.
The difference with stocks and crypto, right now, is emotion is directly affecting price probably to a 3-1 margin over impactful factors. However, emotion has a short-term effect. Impactful factors a longer term affect. A good coin, stock, whatever is led by a team that has their head down on their product and looking to boost their revenue. They see a problem, desire, or need and believe they have the solution that will remedy that issue. IBM, GE and new stocks like Amazon all fill that void.
Short-term, emotion will drive price up or down. Long-term, it will be driven by the value of the asset. It's why bitcoin, so many years later, still continues to appreciate. They had a sound objective Sure, there are dips and spikes, but the progress has been upward.
The question you need to ask: Are you in it as an investment (e.g. long-term) or get-rich quick (e.g. short-term). My advice to long-term investors is to find a coin you like and buy based on the objective and the team. Ignore the financials. Market cap, price, circulation. That's all BS. I'm sorry, as a technical analyst, I don't see the value in those metrics. Particularly when those metrics are fueled by emotion. It goes back to find a coin you like and hold it for a long duration.
As for the 'get-rich' crowd. Good luck. It's a crap shoot. Make no mistake about it. You can say you chose well and did your research and timed the market. But when the market is appreciating 100x or more per year, it doesn't take much luck to get a return. Don't let all these guys who've made 100Ks steer you because you think they are experts. THEY ARE NOT. The market is too new and, more than that, too emotional. I'd almost trust a psychologist than a professional investor to figure out this market. I laugh at some of the impactful market factors and the assumptions on what's driving the market. ITS 90% EMOTION RIGHT NOW.
Here's the question, other than fraud/fake coins - how many 'real' coins have lost total value? Few or none. In an efficient market, the bad coins would have been bankrupt. But that's not happening to real coins. Heck, DOGE is still appreciating when it hasn't been updated in years and the creator is scratching his head about the value. It's emotion. Pure and simple. That's why the crypto day-traders are afraid of regulation.
A rising tide takes all ships. So, the long-term investor is going to receive the same success. The difference? In five years, a majority of the long-term investors will have a better RoR than the short-term/day trader. Don't believe me? How many dot com day traders investors are still rich today? How many of those companies exist? Some, but not many. What is happening now is what happened in 2000. Emotion and new people that believe they could time the market, ended up eventually losing everything.
Fundamentals. I kept my investments after the market crash in 2008. I believed in the companies I was holding and the market. Fundamentals is what will make you money. And you know what? As everyone here is so focused on high risk/high reward of crypto - I've made 10%+ holding in the market over the last 30 days. Not sure how many can honestly claim the same in crypto over that same period.
Will crypto beat the market this year? Very possibly. But the risk is higher. And that's my last point. Please do not put your total portfolio in crypto. Another absolute bedrock of investing - high risk = high reward. High risk means you can lose it too. Day traders during dot com didn't heed that warning. And many lost. I'm holding 10% in crypto. The way I see it, my downside is minimal, but if we get another 1000x return, I'm still going to be doing very well for myself.
Good luck to everyone!
submitted by bayredditmd to Ripple [link] [comments]

Risks/Rewards Of Bitcoin Cash

Recently, I have been thinking a lot about cryptocurrencies. As Satoshi Nakamoto said, "Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own."
When you cut off one head, 2 more will grow in its place. And the BTC vs Bitcoin Cash fork is exactly what happened on 1st Aug 2017. The good news is that Bitcoin Cash has survived and proved its anti-fragility properties. Bitcoin Cash continues its goal as "A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System", as specified in the original Bitcoin whitepaper. Betting against Bitcoin Cash is like betting against Bitcoin in the early years.
In fact, Bitcoin Cash had made such huge progress in the last 2 years, thanks to the extremely talented developers, that the value proposition of Bitcoin Cash has grown multifold. I have no doubt that the prices of cryptocurrencies are heavily manipulated, with no exception to Bitcoin Cash. If some malicious actors wanted to sabotage Bitcoin Cash, they will suppress the prices so that people feel disheartened by it. Evidence of constant trolling, seemingly paid propaganda campaigns, harassments against the Bitcoin Cash community has added weight to this suspicion. And that is why, I have decided to write this article about the risk/reward and share my opinions about Bitcoin Cash.
Let's get right to it. In my opinion, here are the 3 biggest risk factors concerning Bitcoin Cash.
1) Tether Implosion - With the New York AG case hanging over Bitfinex/Tethers, I expect unusually high volatility as the bad guys tries to milk as much money (liquidating longs/shorts) as they can while the court case is still ongoing. However, I expect New York AG to win the case eventually, and the massive loss of confidence in the space will affect the entire crypto space very badly.
2) Hostile Regulatory Climate - Some governments may try to ban cryptocurrencies outright, such as India. Ironically, these countries will be the ones shooting themselves in the foot because the crypto innovations and money will prosper in the more welcoming countries. Given that the crypto space is easily influenced by such news, there may be price dumps in the short term due to such regulatory actions.
3) Malicious Actors Infiltrating BCH Community - Just because it had happened before doesn't mean it won't happen again. Splitting the community is one of the ways to hurt the value proposition of a cryptocurrency. Afterall, it's the community that gives the cryptocurrency its value.
I'm a big fan of Warren Buffett when it comes to value investing. He likes to say, he wished the prices were lower so that he could buy them cheaper. Value investors are always on the lookout for undervalued stocks, buy low sell high. The last few days, I had scooped up as many undervalued Bitcoin Cash as I could, and it felt incredibly liberating. It felt truly awesome knowing that you, and only you, has total control over this new p2p magic Internet money. With BTC, you need to worry about unspendable funds due to insufficient fees. With fiat money, you need to worry about hyperinflation due to corrupt government. With Bitcoin Cash, you never have such worries with your own money.
In my opinion, here are the things going for Bitcoin Cash.
1) Bitcoin Cash has much better fundamentals (Privacy - CashShuffle, Tokens - SLP/Wormhole/etc, Cash Accounts, Utility - Medium of Exchange, Oracles - Sports Betting, etc) than BTC. In other words, this means both the floor and ceiling price for Bitcoin Cash will be much higher than BTC. It may take some time to catch up, but it seems inevitable given Bitcoin Cash's current progress and trajectory. If BTC could reach $20k, then Bitcoin Cash's ceiling could well be multiple times that. This means Bitcoin Cash has a much more attractive risk/reward ratio compared to obselete coins like BTC. In my opinion, BTC is for short term gambling/speculation while Bitcoin Cash is more fundamentals based investment.
2) Bitcoin Cash's Halving is coming within a few months, around 8th April 2020. This means less supply which, based on historic data, usually leads to growing prices.
3) The global money supply is around $75 trillion dollars. With Bitcoin Cash's marketcap of $5 billion dollars currently, and its goals as a medium of exchange, $75 trillion will give us plenty of room to grow into. Even if we consider shadow banking, which Bitcoin Cash is well suited for, that's around $50 trillion dollars. That's a lot of room to grow into so again, the risk/reward ratio is too attractive for me to pass up.
4) Bitcoin Cash is my insurance policy. Most people didn't know that the average lifespan of a fiat currency is only 27 years nor do they know fiat currency such as US dollars had lost over 90% of its purchasing power in mere decades. If it could happen to once properous countries such as Venezuela or Greece or Argentina or even powerful nations such as America, it could happen to any country. Of if there is a war, how am I going to carry the gold bar across the border without getting robbed by the borders officers? Bitcoin Cash is my insurance policy to be able to seek refuge in a safe country and protect my loved ones from poverty when such precarious situations happens.
5) I think Bitcoin Cash is still in the very early adopters period. It's exactly like Bitcoin back in 2010 where only a small group of folks know what's up. Back then, when you talk about Bitcoin to people, they had all these wrong impressions due to their lack of understanding about it. Likewise, when you talk about Bitcoin Cash now even in the crypto space alone, you can see people with wrong impressions due to their lack of understanding about it. Some see this as a problem, I see this as an opportunity to be ahead of the crowd and accumulate more Bitcoin Cash!
One of the things I learnt from people like Jack Ma is that if you do what everyone else is doing, you're going to get what everyone else is getting, average results. Value investors educate themselves and are ahead of the curve. So I am not even mad at the propaganda against Bitcoin Cash, because it helps value investors like myself get as much Bitcoin Cash at as low a price point as possible ahead of the pack. Thanks to those trolls costantly spreading lies and propaganda against Bitcoin Cash, because if not for them, I would have left so much more money on the table while buying those same amount of Bitcoin Cash.
6) The Bitcoin Cash community is awesome. What can I say, so many incredibly smart and passionate folks making a difference in shaping the future of money. I think it's worth repeating that what gives cryptocurrency its value is because of its community. If I am going to put my money on something, one of the driving factors is definitely the awesome community.
7) Let's do some Math about BTC. Miners need to sell their BTC to pay for electricity. 6 (blocks/hour) * 24 (hours) * 12.5 (block reward) * $12000 * 30 (days/month) is equal to $648 million dollars per month required just to sustain the BTC price. Do you really believe there is $648 million dollars each month or about $8 billion dollars a year of new money coming into BTC? Really? I am not sure anyone with so much money is that stupid to buy BTC. And even so, it merely sustains the BTC price at $12000. If the price goes up to $20k, you need more than 1 billion dollars of new money coming in every single month! On the other hand, Bitcoin Cash just needs $16 million dollars per month to grow, which looks much more sustainable to me.
BTC Maximalists loves shouting how BTC will get to a million dollars, as if repeating over and over what they hope to be true, will make it come true. Sheeps follow these lies without thinking for themselves. They seems to believe that by repeating a lie or name calling (bcash) long enough, it will become reality. I leave you this quote from Michael Burry (The Big Short), "People want an authority to tell them how to value things, but they choose this authority not based on facts or results. They choose it because it feels authoritative and familiar."
With Bitcoin Cash, there is no authority nor maximalists telling you what you can or cannot do. I see Bitcoin Cash as the people's money and having Bitcoin Cash gives me the feeling of solidarity with commoners around the world. Everytime I read about how badly some governments treated their own citizens, it makes me buy more Bitcoin Cash with a passion. Unlike other cryptocurrencies such as BTC which depends on lies and propaganda to sustain its price, Bitcoin Cash survives based on merits and fundamentals and putting power back into the peoples hands. I hold Bitcoin Cash with a happy clear conscience and sleep well at night. Bitcoin Cash is betting against dumb money (aka lambo/moon bois) and soon enough, we will know just how dumb that money really is.
Sorry about the wall of text. It was an accumulation of days of thoughts and self reflection.
submitted by MobTwo to Bitcoincash [link] [comments]

How I LOST a lot of money with Bitcoin, and why I don't give a fuck.

I Buy Bitcoin

There, now you know, I own a Bitcoin (or more) and I buy them fucking coins.
Recently I had an investor come to me with big monster dollars; he says buy me dem fucking coins. I wait for the right time to buy, and boom it's $13k...
Long story short, my investor is down 20%. Does he give a fuck? Nope! Why? Cause he ain't cashing out!
He's got time, and I got confidence dem coins be going back to $11k... and probably more!
4 YEARS - 4 years is the life-cycle of a Bitcoin.
In 4 years, Bitcoins should be expected to double. Merely doubling every 4 years is 19% returns (annualized)... HOLLARAGE!
If Bitcoins go to $22k... in the next 4 years... my investor is psyched. If it hits $88k in... 12 years... that's still awesome.
Even with only 20% of his portfolio devoted to Bitcoins, Bitcoins might out earn the other 80%... with far, far less work, effort, and taxes - just buying and holding for multiple years.
And that is even if it only hits $88k IN TWELVE YEARS. That's 19% ROI (BTC) vs 8% ROI (SPY).
Now that man is old. He don't need no money.
But what 'bout me? I got bills homes.
Now here is deh trick.
ARE YOU EARNING YOUR MAXIMUM?
Probably, for reasons, you ain't.
What's that mean? It means you are losing - LOSING - money each year you work, below the better wage.
Bitcoin ain't my meal ticket... that's work. Bitcoin is my lifelong security ticket.
But Bitcoin gives me something other investments don't, POSSIBILITY. The possibility to get to quit work and retire, instantly.
Now what do you do with new found knowledge? Well first you focus on making that fooking dollar. Make so much dollar, working almost seems fun. What does it take to make that? A new mindset. Checkout a business book, visit professional clubs, make that fucking money.
You got to get smart.
Focus on no less than $200k per annum for self-employed, or $100k if W2 with full benefits - accept absolutely no less.
Are you making $30k / year? Invest in skill training, equipment. For $10k you can nab a computer programming career in a year paying $60k.
That's 300% return on investment, do it. Fully capitalized (profit x 5), that's $150k expected from a $10k investment... CLAP HANDS DO IT.
If ya got to work for fucking money, make it easy. Make it reward. Get smart, so the money gets easy. Get them rewards, so that you enjoy that work.
HOW LONG HAVE YOU SUFFERED AT LOW PAY? How long did you allow yourself to 'slave' without any chance of success or thriving!
NO MORE!
I committed myself to smart work, making good dollar some 2 years ago.
But still Bitcoin boomed... so what did I do? Did I buy a lambo? Did I quit?
Fuck all, no!
BOOM - Now my salary demands doubled - doubled mother fucker.
In 2 years I go from $80k to $200k (annualized, self-employed).
But do I actually make that $200k? No.
More like I went from $80k to $80k... but from 30 hours to 10 hours of laboring, per week.
The thing is, I ABSOLUTELY LOVE MY JOB!
You'd be surprised, but getting paid $200 / hour makes you love god-damn about anything, honestly.
Even if Bitcoin booms, would I retire? Fuck no. WHY THE FUCK WOULD I? I GET PAID FUCKING AMAZING!
And what if Bitcoin goes slow, or in the tubes? WHO GIVES A FUCK! I making money hand over fist, and got the career path to earn butt loads more.
I might spend 10 hours per week now branding or networking to make the next mark... but laboring a mere 2 hours more per week might double my savings... that's huge!
And what am I going to do if Bitcoin goes bust?
TAKE ANOTHER STAB MOTHER FUCKER!
I got Tesla in my sights, I had Lambda School on the radar from day 1.
TAKE A STAB!
If you lose out, you keep working... GREAT! I got to do that EVEN IF I WIN with the STOCK MARKET!
But if you take a chance on an early investment stage startup, you can get 100% annualized returns.
It only takes a few of these to hit, and boom, you are fucking a loaded god.
But I got money security because I have skills security.
I got the skills to make the fucking money.
What I need is WEALTH, not money.
For my buck, Bitcoin is the best wealth making investment at this point in time, available to a general public.
Bitcoin is also the best store of wealth, cause it's mobile, and I am mobile.. I can't get cornered at the ATM by Uncle Sam nor can I get trapped having to liquidate and rotate around a series of real-estate and stock holdings, should I want to move to Puerto Rico, or whatnot.
And inflation risk is less concerning, with Bitcoin... and the passive price inflation is expected to be 19%, at a mere doubling every 4 years. That is HUGGGEEE!
In fact, I've taken out (don't hate me) loans at good interest rates and long payoffs, to buy them fucking coins.
While it sounds crazy, students absolutely should be buying long-term, huge-payoff investments (like Bitcoin) - financially speaking
But that is aside the point. The point is:
If you are worried about a dip - EARN MORE MONEY!
If you are want wealth - GO LONG! 4 YEARS AT LEAST!
If you want a lambo - YOU ARE A MORON! - and -
If you want to retire - GET PAID MORE TODAY!
And beyond that, just be realistic. 8% returns is about the SPY average, but say even 11% is a reasonably well-managed index - still, that is miles below 19% for Bitcoin.
Now how does BTC get to 19%? By maintaining consistent demand, and consistent cash-out-cash-in rates of investment.
Not consistent PERCENTAGES, but consistent DOLLARS.
In effect, for Bitcoin to fail to achieve 19% (over 4 years), barring an unusual event (like Satoshi liquidating), then the amount of DOLLARS on the planet must never increase (technology stops, population flatlines) OR Bitcoin has already reached peak popularity, and significantly so.
So that's the question to you...
Has an investment that predictably returns 19% reached peak popularity and widespread public adoption? An investment unseizable, totally movable, and completely passive? Transferable worldwide in an instant?
I think not. I say we got ROOOOOOMMM to grow.
And that is why I don't give a fuck about losing money - I'm not about to take it out in cash.
And that is why I don't give a fuck about selling Bitcoins - I'm only selling to EARN way more money in job skills, which goes back to Bitcoin.
sploosh peace out!
submitted by Bitcoin1776 to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Some thoughts on the blocksize from a longtimer

People need to realize, that at the current (and still raising) popularity of Bitcoin, bigger blocks wouldn't help much if at all.
The thing is, it is very easy to fill blocks. If blocks aren't consistently full, users can effectively set fees to as low as they want and miners will include them anyway. Maybe there's going to be some delay, maybe not. Nice and dandy, but it doesn't work for long. It worked for BTC because the number of users was tiny. And it will work for altcoins, as long as they are tiny. But as soon as a given altcoin gets popular enough to be even remotely significant, it will hit the same wall.
As soon as there is more demand than room on the blockchain, some transactions will be left-over and start piling up: the mempool will keep raising until some people are priced out. Some users will say: "well, that's too much, I'm not going to do that test transaction" or "I'm going to use an altcoin for this". There is a "cut-off cliff of pain". I estimate that this pain-price point to be around $10-$20 and kind-of fixed. Exactly between "too expensive for paying for any coffee" and "super-cheap way to make international wires". Where rich users are fine paying, but smaller users have been cut-off. Bitcoin got there already. That's why it's nearing $20k/BTC. That's what many of you wanted, right?
Tip for people with small amounts stuck: get your wallets ready and maybe, if you're lucky, there will another time when network will calm-down a bit (around new year maybe? or maybe when Coinbase finally start supporting SegWit, etc) and either: consolidate all your small outputs into one bigger TXO (segwit one!), or send to an exchange during that time so at least you can sell it. Just three weeks ago we had a period of 2-5sat/B transaction clearing out.
Anyway, there is no other way. We can't have billions of people on-chain. If we had 8MB blocks, we would still fill them up, until some people wouldn't be able to compete with the fees. Maybe we would buy ourselves a month or two.
Also: I've heard many people complain that using the coins is most important, and better for Bitcoin than holding it. It's absolute rubbish. The value of Bitcoin is set by how many people are willing to HODL it at a given price-point, not how many people are willing to spend it. "Spending" Bitcoin is just a transfer of Bitcoin from person A, to person B - nothing in the system changed except current owner of some coins. It's even worse if B automatically sells for fiat immediately. Holding BTC means that your consider it worth more than a current market price. Bitcoin could totally work and be worth millions per piece, even with transactions at $100, as long as people consider it safe and worth holding. As long as I can spend $100 once a year to increase my BTC-retirement-fund, and then spend $100 once a year, once I retired to cash out to some local currency, I'm all good.
Now, I now it sucks if you're not rich, and you can't toy with it, and keep sending between wallets etc. And you feel like altcoins are better etc. And it's true - ATM many altcoins a cheaper way to send small sums of money around. But saving / investing... let me tell you how it looks from my perspective...
I am a software engineer in Sillicon Valley. I have a well-paying job, I eat $20-worth of sushi for dinner, pay $10 every time I trade stocks, pay $3k each month for rent. I can invest $10k in BTC without thinking too much about it. And I'm not telling you this to make you jealous. The wealth inequality is so vast! That's just reality and I think it gives some perspective. I know as I wasn't born here. And I'm no one special here. I'm a nobody. I can't even afford a decent house here. (hindsight is always 20/20, ha)
And there are thousands of software engineers like this. They receive and trade stocks on a weekly/monthly basis, worry about the overpriced stock market, overpriced housing, pilling up cash that they have no idea what to do with. Do you think they care if Bitcoin transaction costs $10? No, they don't. And how many people who complain about $1 fees will take to invest as much as a person like me can? Hundreds. And as I said - I'm nobody. A CEOs here can drop $1MM on Bitcoin, just because they feel playful a given day, or they got jealous of some other CEO friend told them how awesome they are doing with BTC, during a golf game on Saturday. And they wouldn't worry about 50% correction much if at all. And do you think these people buy value-phones and look for good deals on economy-class cars? Do you think they have time to research which altcoin of the day has low transactions? Come on. They will all think something like: "let's put 0.1% of my cash into this magic internet money and see what happens. I want that Bitcoin thing too.".
So, you're free to have your own opinion, but if you ask me, for time being, the people who can not afford to transmit Bitcoin too often will and should just hold it, transferring it when it's relatively cheaper, and use altcoins for playfull spending etc. Just don't expect too much return on your altcoin holdings. I expect Bitcoin to consistently keep growing the fastest, while altcoins keep multiplying. It is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Or an iPhone vs hundreds of Android spin-offs thing. I use Android, but do I believe someone will dethrone iPhone? Nope.
In a sense... you want to invest in Apple stocks, even if you can't afford to drop $1k on an iPhone yourself. Because of people richer than you that can, and will.
And if it makes it any better, I know that LN will solve it all for us. We just need to wait a couple of months.. a year maybe for it to be more common. And I've been through all the early hacks, crashes, MtGox, great depression, forking drama... years and years of problems. And Bitcoin being too popular is like the smallest problem I've seen so far. The problem that smaller coins would like to have, haha. Being patient and some educated faith is what you are rewarded for.
Edit: I woke up, and I have to work, so I'm just going to address some common themes.
Obviously I created this account as throw-away. Duh.
I already can send quickly money for free. I send my friends money with Google Wallet every day. And in many countries in Europe free wires were a thing for like 10 years now. And for purchasing stuff I am very happy with credit cards. They give me points and stuff. If someone thinks Bitcoin can compete as a "payment processor", then I don't know what to say... Wake up, Bitcoin in itself was never really that great at it. Bitcoin won't be a payment processor for the masses. It will be an alternative monetary and banking system. And on top of it, we will get cheap payments and such.
The reason why I hold Bitcoin is that I have something that can't be taken away from me. Through theft, inflation, confiscation, economic crisis, banking collapse, unjust court order, you name it. Noone can prove I have it, noone can take it away. I can keep 1% of my wealth in this weird thing and sleep better at night. Other reasons are secondary, though sure... speculation on the price is a nice thing.
LN networks are going to work. As a software engineer, I understood how Bitcoin works since I've read the whitepaper and did some research. I've always admired how simple it is. Cryptography part requires expertise, but that's OK. LNs are very elegant and simple too. On a daily basis, I work and improve systems that are way, way more complex than BTC + LN.
submitted by hodlforthelongest to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

The whole Ambrosus AMA in one Post

1) For ensuring the possibility that Ambrosus can be successful in achieving its objectives, what can the community do in order to try and facilitate this? Is there anything that you would like to see people doing more/less of to support the project?
1) If you have connections at any companies that manufacture/distribute food/pharma/chemicals/luxury products, make an intro (rewards available); 2) if you know any consultancy/ICT companies/integrators, introduce them to our tech/code to possibly develop Joint Value Proposition**
3) if you are a dev, contribute to our code; IoT enthusiast - then expertiment using our tech; 4) if you are an entrepreneur launching startups, consider launching it on AMB-NET (support/financing available from dev pool); 5) just generally educate others about #ambrosus. Thx
https://mobile.twitter.com/yashilou/status/1065572906040737793
*....info on releases of partnerships etc. What is the aim for the next 6 months with regards to promoting the brand even further to reach more potential community members? *
1/ Presently we promote the brand via PR (placement in top-tier media, thought leadership), attendance of high-profile conferences (industry / crypto), holding various meetups, online promotion of brand, community engagement, interactive social media. Next year we want to have
more personalised/targetted communication towards individual verticals/sub-industries, with detailed corporate USP, tailored pricing, commercial aspects; we are also fostering consultants/entrepreneurs around Ambrosus with narrow focus who will approach individual industries.
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065947465944363008
3) Can you give an update on the current PoC's? What do you estimate to be the probability that the clients will continue once the PoC's are done? How is the general feedback regarding the solutions you are offering them?
We primarily hire additional people to specifically work on delivery and execution of projects. I think PoC is not necessarily the right term to use, because it implies that the tech is unproven and the concept itself needs to be proved (hence proof of concept, PoC), on our 1/...
side we are talking about industrial projects (some of them can be called pilot projects), whereby we actually integrate our tech into supply chain operations. The feedback we are getting on that is overwhelmingly positive and we are developing larger-scale proposals with partner
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065948382634672128
5) Random q: Was the number 361 million tokens chosen because it represents the km² of the ocean/was there another motivation for choosing that no. in particular? And, what was the logic behind that number of tokens chosen rather than, say 100mn/1 bn?
actually this number resulted from the smart contract, based on emission of AMB, which in turn was based on ETH incoming.
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065949442413666304
DHelix85: If you applied for a node in the 1st wave (not accepted yet) and now wish to upgrade to a bigger node, can you replace your intial application with the new one and not drop to the end of the queue?
I think a new application should be submitted, the applicants will be cross-checked with old lists, so no risk of being at the end. We have now placed one person full-time to deal with masternodes applicants (Aleksandra), to help the dev team stay focused on building $AMB-NET.
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065949908702773248
1) Angel, what do you think is necessary to take Ambrosus from 0 to 10k bundles a day?
2) And to take it from 10k to 100k bundles daily? How do you see the company getting there?....
We are now actively modeling the pricing structure and transactions on chain. Firstly, for many business use-cases a bundle does not have to be full to make sense (e.g. a luxury watch producer may use 1 bundle for 10 watches, at 1$ per watch, which makes sense for them 1/...
similarly, for containers or individual units the bundling processes may be different. So, it should not be assumed that the full 16k+ transactions need to be filled to dispatch a bundle. Our current projects help us to optimise the total number of bundles/transactions for AMBNET
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065950293236551681
3) When Ambrosus is doing, let's say, over 100k bundles a day, do you think your job as CEO will be different than now? How?
I am very impressed with what AMB has achieved so far, in so little time. Congratulations to you and to the whole team!
Hard for me to speculate, but I think the core aspects of Ambrosus will remain the same, only the complexity of scaling will of course make the network less nimble. Our minds are preoccupied with assuring true decentralisation in all senses of that word
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065952712444006401
Will the Apollo node auctions start in November or not until Q1? Both have been stated during timeline updates.
I think the dev team are tweaking a few parameters and have also ordered another cybersecurity audit for AMB-NET to try and break it. On this side they push the Better Safe than Sorry narrative, with which I have to agree..
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065953205752864769
What is the most important difference between amb and other projects with similar goals?
Our intimate knowledge of BOTH #blockchain and #IoT. The foundations of the $AMB-NET architecture were built with IoT in mind. Most other projects are trying to stitch two technologies together, without having proper understanding of either blockchain or iot
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065953692334137345
AMA -- When would you think may can release new road map for 2019-2020? What's your time frame may could starting sign contracts with the long term partnership corporation of using your product and also starting have revenue? Thank you very much.
we already have a roadmap/vision for 2019, we now go through the structural/cosmetic changes and are also debating whether to release it end of this year, or early 2019. Negotiations for long-term contracts are currently ongoing.BTW the network itself should run without Ambrosus
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065954552627765248
#AMB_AMA Q: How closely is the success of the Ambrosus protocol tied to the growth of the Ethereum ecosystem and their progress towards scalability? ...would a different base-layer protocol ever be an option?
We do not use Ethereum as base-layer protocol. This was the case at the very early stages of Ambrosus. We now have our own architecture, with our own scalability/IoT/storage solutions. We cooperate a lot with ETH stakeholders, but AMBNET does not depend on their progress/success
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065954890692919297
#AMB_AMA I would love to better understand the uniqueness of Amber as "the first data-bonded token." Q: Does Ambrosus have any posts/articles/case studies out there to better describe the possibilities and uniqueness of this new architecture?
our white paper is very outdated, please refer to (link: http://blog.ambrosus.com) blog.ambrosus.com for all the latest developments / updates to architecture, cryptoeconomics and more. We will release a new paper in the foreseeable future that as a single document will perform the WP function
and yes, all the use-cases you are talking about are also discussed at length in our blog , which i in general recommend to everyone following the project to follow, as it contains all the up to date and relevant info/content on the project.
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065955293023088640
#AMB_AMA Q: What does the recent Securities and Exchange Commission court ruling mean for the AMB token? Will Ambrosus be registering $AMB token as a security with the SEC... or filing as an exemption?
We carefully avoided all the interactions that would put us under the jurisdiction of the SEC. For future interactions, our legal team will assess and act as appropriate.
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065956124455776258
Can you tell us more about the different revenue streams of Ambrosus now and in the future? (E.g AMB-NET, Sensors, Consulting or IT Integration work)
The key focus for us right now is to make AMB-NET a self-sustaining network that could operate without support of any third party, including Amrbosus. Thus sensors, consultancy, IT integration we leave to partners and focus on the blockchain to run irrespective of revenues
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065957306020569088
There has been some talk of the sec cracking down on certain ERC20 tokens. Is this a concern at all? How well equipped is Ambrosus legally and financially?
already answered on sec below. as for the legal, it's immensely complicated in crypto, and we leave it to the professional teams to take care of our legal/compliance, while we focus on the tech and delivery
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065957796875780096
Looking forward to hear ETA for swap from erc20 to native Amber tokens and how? Also wondering when will we be able to start Atlas nodes freely without invitation? Lastly when moon sir? :)
this is a better question to the dev team. For me, I want it to happen now, but it's not feasible technology-wise. I think permissionless onboarding for Atlas nodes will be possible in Q2 2019. Full moon is today, next one 22 dec
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065958297352716290
Can we see somewhere in the eth explorer how are the amb tokens moving from erc20 to native amb token on amb-net? Is more tokens floating from or to amb-net?
the bridge for real AMB/AMBERC20 has not yet been released on mainnet, as they are still testing it on test net. On nodes you already can play with TESTAMB. The dev team are doing a new security audit on AMB-NET, so after that they can launch the bridge, it will be visible on eth
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065958759409819648
What impact, if any, does the current state of the crypto market have on a companies willingness to implement Ambrosus' blockchain supply chain solutions?
our discussions with corporates seldom involve the discussion of the crypto markets. we focus on the tech and integration with them, not the value of various digital assets.
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065959004034215936
1) Do you think the number of partnerships will increase?
2) How is the masternodes going now? The both of the test net and main net working well?
3) When will the AMB-NET 2.0 (industrial grade one) be launched?
4) How many bundles are the publicly announced 5 partnerships generating currently and how do you think the possibilities that they increase it in the coming months?
5) What are the assumed number of Atlases for 1k, 10k, 100k bundles respectively?
6) How many applications for the masternode have you got so far? Could you provide us with the estimated number of the running nodes in the future?
7) If the number of masternode far exceeds the estimated number, will you cap the number of it?
1/ if I didn't think that, I would not be involved in the project.
2/ going well, talk to onboarded people on slack/tg to get their insights
3/ as per dev team's roadmap should be end of this year
4/ see my answer on bundles below
5/ not sure what you mean by this question. There is an upper limit of the number of bundles an Atlas node could host, which is defined by the technical imperatives outlined by the dev team
6/ we are well into the 4digit numbers with the number of applicants who submitted full applications to be a masternode operator. I am personally looking at a few hundred apollos and about 10 thousand atlases in the future, but we have some tech team members arguing for limiting
7/ the numbers for stakes in masternodes were designed in such a way as to never reach the point where we would have to cap any numbers
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065959353575006208
1) In a scale from 1 to 10, how do you think that the adoption of AMB-Net is going so far?
I am a biased party to ask for such an assessment. I am also a perfectionist and thus I am never satisfied with anything so there could not be a perfect score anyway
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065961119246925824
2) Can we expect more commercial partnerships in the near future (next 2-3 months)?
yes, we are working on a few interesting deals now
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065966085172862976
3) What is a rough ratio between companies wanting to run their own Hermes node (pay in crypto) vs companies wanting someone else running the Hermes node (paying in fiat)?
most large corporates want to run and host their own nodes (for data ownership/ privacy, amongst other reasons), whereas the SMEs have a tendency to require a BaaS type of support
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065966412743753728
4) Which of the upcoming milestones of Ambrosus are you the most excited for and why?
Execution of transactions between IoT devices in a smart city in a decentralised and autonomous manner (long-term). All masternodes onboarded and maintaining the network independently (mid-term). First ICO to accept $AMB (short-term).
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065968212104355841
5) What could be the biggest catalyst for adoption of AMB-Net in your opinion?
more nimble SMEs/startups adopting innovative technologies such as $AMB-NET and showing great growth due to consumer trust/choice and improved business operations should cause large enterprises to speed up their adoption of such technologies
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065968899034886144
#Ambrosus AMA
Have you ever been approached by any Japanese companies?
What do you think would be the hardest part when you try to get adoptions from Japanese companies?
We had a few invitations to various corporate accelerators and/or public sector sanctioned business programmes in Tokyo. Unfortunately, the stipulations included the senior team moving to Japan, which was not an option. Thus so far we have not had much involvement in Japan.
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065969297284112384
1. What is your biggest concern for ambrosus success as a whole? 2. What can the US community do to help spread awareness and help ambrosus succeed here?....
1/ to what extent corp management and even the end consumers care about true decentralisation. Ultimately, it seems few people are bothered that IBM or Ripple are not truly decentralised/trustless, and they still adopt their tech... 2/ see my response on the community help below.
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065969864161091584
3. What is the status of my resume? (self-plug haha but seriously I've been trying to work on your dev and full stack or front end developer team for some time now!) - from a strong and passionate developer, Mannan
the dev team reviewed it and right now it does not suit their needs. Vlad told me he replied to your enquiry
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065970873893564416
Are you going to fix the issue with Storage Limit for Omega masternode in the contract config that was posted on reddit and github?
I am not personally creating code for masternodes. I think such a request is best made via github and the dev team will fix this, if it needs fixing
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065971263301185541
Are you having any goal till January in terms of new clients just like you gave a count of 5 for october?
not till january, because it's christmas time and most corporates are busy with end of year issues and then vacations. see my other reply below on a similar question. in short, we do have other ongoing initiatives. i have made changes to our business team to better achieve goals
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065971557007269888
Ambrosus' mainnet will launch soon and thus the native blockchain it's running on. Ambrosus is also planning to release wallet applications and handle the token swap....
yes, in the latest blog entry from Vlad, you can see that a Wallet for native AMB is coming. as for the swap for the foreseeable future we envision a two-way bridge between native AMB and ERC20 to ensure compatibility, while we build infra for native AMB
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065971915989413890
Can you tell us a little bit about how (in your experience) companies currently see Ambrosus compared to other blockchain supply chain solutions like vechain, Ibm one etc. (like a mini market analysis...)
most corporations we deal with are not aware of vechain or other crypto projects' existence. they usually compare us to IBM, Oracle, EY Blockchain, etc. They see our unique IoT architecture and expertise as USP, which others, even the big guys do not necessarily have.
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065972439702798337
Can you tell us a little bit about how (in your experience) companies currently see Ambrosus compared to other blockchain supply chain solutions like vechain, Ibm one etc. (like a mini market analysis...)
Which sensor from your innovation lab excites you the most, and why?
what is the biggest challenge/deal breaker when trying to sign up customers?
I am very interested in the sensors that are able to process data in a trusted enrivonment and sign transactions on the blockchain at the sensor level. according to Innolab, such sensors can become like lite clients of the blockchain, enabling any IoT devices to be blockchain nod
answered below where i talked about education for top management about real blockchain vs decentralised constructs with a single point of control and failure. most people are either unaware of the distinction or do not care much about it, so long as blockchain buzzword is there
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065974008292745218
In a scale from 1 to 10, how do you think that the adoption of AMB-Net is going so far? Can we expect more commercial partnerships in the near future (next 2-3 months)? What is a rough ratio between companies wanting to
all these questions answered below
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065974532035551232
What is the baseline of the size of companies you would work with regarding the revenue?
I will put a contact form in my website so that Japanese companies can more easily ask me about Ambrosus in Japnese.
actually we have value proposition both for small and large companies. Big companies are nice because they offer scale but are slow, whereas small companies compensate for their size with their nimble approach and ability to adapt processes faster. Thus both are interesting to us
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065978121856475136
Q: Angel, with Devcon4 behind us, what are you thoughts on Ethereum's progress towards scalability?
Q: Does the success of the Ethereum ecosystem matter much to Ambrosus' developers? Would a different blockchain base-layer protocol ever be an option?
1/ I have always been a fan of Ethereum community, in terms of a large number of thinkers and visionaries they have gathered. Unlike EOS/Tezos who seem to try to buy communities with money, or IBM who are plain boring, Ethereum is truly about experimentation and bold vision...
many great proposals to scalability of Ethereum. Of course they keep pushing the deadline and are vague on any timeline of execution, but let's be frank, who isn't? They also succumbed to the hype last year, but vision is limited only by imagination, while execution has friction
thus, all tech needs time. I do believe there are enough people with vested interest around Ethereum technology and a lot of visionaries who cannot be simply bought off (although I guess every person has their sale price...), so I am hopeful of Ethereum's future
We do not directly depend on Ethereum's success/failure, but of course we are heavily intertwined with many leading stakeholders from the ecosystem. We are influenced heavily by the tech, perception, markets, successes/failtures of Ethereum as spillover effects. AMB-NET is built
on solidity framework and uses many elements from Ethereum, so where needed we are happy to borrow more of their open-source code - and then also share our improved/updated code with other projects. So yes, when others are doing well, we are also doing better. Of course all the
uncertaintly and badmouthing that ethereum is experiencing does not help us, but now the pendulum of the crypto has swung towards panic, delusion, despondence and blame-game - which too shall pass - we aim to prove our point and deliver the tech that works and improves the world.
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065978675135434752
thank you very much for the AMA session everyone. We appreciate having a strong and curious community who come up with strong contributions and have critical thinking. Until next time. In the meantime enjoy my latest interview with @Independent on #bitcoin
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/bitcoin-price-usd-2018-crash-analysis-stock-cryptocurrency-bubble-burst-dotcom-a8648296.html
https://mobile.twitter.com/angelversetti/status/1065984937281667072
submitted by skythe4 to ambrosus [link] [comments]

Simple Bityard Exchange - Registering, Affiliate Rewards, and Demo Trades! (Bityard Review 2020) BITCOIN BLAST Make Earn Get Real Free Money Cash App Apps Game Online 2020 Review Youtube YT Video What is the block reward in Bitcoin and why is the reward so big? Gold vs. Stocks: Risk/Reward + Your Questions  Bill Murphy (Jun 26, 2018) I Tried Day Trading Bitcoin for a Week  Beginner Crypto ...

Could bitcoin be a way to modernise backwards-facing employee and customer rewards programs? Grayscale Bitcoin Fund Points to Lower Demand. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust holds partial reserves of bitcoin wrapped in an investment product. Due to the nature of GBTC demand, there is often a slight premium to BTC market prices. Currently, the premium is the lowest in seven months, despite the overall positive performance of bitcoin in 2019. ... In 2018, New York Stock Exchange owner Intercontinental Exchange announced the launch of Bakkt, which uses Microsoft cloud solutions to create an open and regulated global ecosystem for digital ... Matt’s second huge bitcoin catalyst seems to be one thing that’s already occurred — the halvening. Again to Matt: Up till a pair months in the past, a “bitcoin miner” acquired 12.5 bitcoins for mining a block. Miners in the present day obtain 6.25 bitcoins as a reward. The tip result’s that ALL bitcoins are extra helpful. Bitcoin Goes Bullish, Snap Stock Jumps 28% PayPal's decision to support Bitcoin could be a major turning point in the cryptocurrency's adoption.

[index] [6297] [14635] [3902] [50245] [25340] [35820] [9484] [27928] [49162] [35854]

Simple Bityard Exchange - Registering, Affiliate Rewards, and Demo Trades! (Bityard Review 2020)

“Should I stay or should I go now? If I go, there will be trouble And if I stay it will be double So come on and let me know Should I stay or should I go?” ~ The Clash (Recorded Jun 26, 2018 ... #bitcoin #cryptocurrencies #crypto What are your thoughts what we discussed? Do you have any thoughts on current markets? Feel free to leave a comment below! Thank you all so much for watching the ... Have fun playing Bitcoin Blast and cash out on REAL Bitcoin! Not only is this match-three mobile game fun to play, you will get rewarded with Bling Points that can be exchanged for Bitcoin. The ... Share your videos with friends, family, and the world Live Stock Scanner 8/3 Pre-market Gap scanner Bullish Bears 196 watching. Live now; How to Buy Cryptocurrency for Beginners (Ultimate Step-by-Step Guide) Pt 1 - Duration: 29:14. Crypto Casey ...

#